Territorial Conflict Analysis
Territorial conflict analysis tests the proposition — central to the 'territorial explanation of war' — that what states fight over matters, and that disputes over territory are especially war-prone. Vasquez and Henehan (2001) operationalize this by coding disputes for the issue at stake (territory, policy, regime) and comparing how often each type escalates to war. The consistent finding that territorial disputes are more likely to lead to war than other kinds reframes the study of conflict around the contested issue rather than only the attributes of the disputants.
Pročitajte cijelu metodu
Prijavite se besplatnim računom kako biste pročitali ovaj odjeljak.
Karta metoda
Okruženje srodnih metoda — odaberite čvor za istraživanje.
Izvori
- Vasquez, J., & Henehan, M. T. (2001). Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), 123–138. DOI: 10.1177/0022343301038002001 ↗
Kako citirati ovu stranicu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Analysis of Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/hr/international-relations/territorial-conflict-analysis
Koja metoda?
Postavite ovu metodu uz njoj najsrodnije i pročitajte ih jednu uz drugu — knjižnica vam knjige stavlja na stol; izbor je na vama.
- Dyadic Conflict AnalysisInternational Relations↔ usporedi
- Enduring Rivalry AnalysisInternational Relations↔ usporedi
- Militarized Interstate Dispute AnalysisInternational Relations↔ usporedi
Slične metode
Uočili ste pogrešku na ovoj stranici? Prijavite je ili predložite ispravak →