Democratic Peace Analysis
Democratic peace analysis is the empirical study of the proposition that democracies rarely or never fight one another. Building on the dyadic research design crystallized by Maoz and Russett (1993), it codes the regime type of each state, constructs dyad-years, and models the probability of militarized conflict as a function of joint democracy alongside controls for power, contiguity, alliances, and trade. The approach has produced one of the most robust empirical regularities in international relations and a long debate over whether shared norms or institutional structures account for it.
Pročitajte cijelu metodu
Prijavite se besplatnim računom kako biste pročitali ovaj odjeljak.
Karta metoda
Okruženje srodnih metoda — odaberite čvor za istraživanje.
Izvori
- Maoz, Z., & Russett, B. (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 624–638. DOI: 10.2307/2938740 ↗
Kako citirati ovu stranicu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Empirical Analysis of the Democratic Peace. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/hr/international-relations/democratic-peace-analysis
Koja metoda?
Postavite ovu metodu uz njoj najsrodnije i pročitajte ih jednu uz drugu — knjižnica vam knjige stavlja na stol; izbor je na vama.
- Dyadic Conflict AnalysisInternational Relations↔ usporedi
- Militarized Interstate Dispute AnalysisInternational Relations↔ usporedi
- Polity Score AnalysisInternational Relations↔ usporedi
Citirana u
Slične metode
Uočili ste pogrešku na ovoj stranici? Prijavite je ili predložite ispravak →