ScholarGate
Asistent

Usporedite metode

Pregledajte odabrane metode jednu uz drugu; retci koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Wordfish×Wordscores×
PodručjePsihometrijaPsihometrija
ObiteljLatent structureLatent structure
Godina nastanka20082003
TvoracJonathan Slapin, Svenja-Sophia ProkschMichael Laver, Kenneth Benoit, John Garry
VrstaGenerative text model for dimension reductionText analysis and dimension reduction
Temeljni izvorSlapin, J. B., & Proksch, S. O. (2008). A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. Journal of Politics, 70(3), 554-569. DOI ↗Laver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311-331. DOI ↗
Drugi nazivi
Srodne55
SažetakWordfish is a statistical model for scaling documents on latent dimensions, developed by Slapin and Proksch (2008). Unlike reference-based methods like Wordscores, Wordfish uses a Poisson generative model to jointly estimate word frequencies and document positions without requiring reference texts or manual annotation. It is particularly useful for estimating time-series changes in policy positions and can scale documents from multiple languages simultaneously.Wordscores is a text-based scaling method developed by Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003) that estimates the policy positions of political actors based on word frequencies in their texts. By comparing word usage in reference texts of known positions with test texts, the method infers the latent political dimension of any document without requiring manual coding or training data.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretraživanje Preuzmi prezentaciju

ScholarGateUsporedite metode: Wordfish · Wordscores. Preuzeto 2026-06-19 s https://scholargate.app/hr/compare