ScholarGate
Asistent

Usporedite metode

Pregledajte odabrane metode jednu uz drugu; retci koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Usklađena studija faze IV×Uparivanje prema ocjeni sklonosti×
PodručjeEpidemiologijaIstraživačka statistika
ObiteljProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka1980s–1990s (formalized in post-marketing regulatory frameworks)1983
TvoracRegulatory tradition (FDA, EMA); matching methodology from Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
VrstaObservational study designMethod
Temeljni izvorStrom, B. L., & Kimmel, S. E. (Eds.). (2005). Textbook of Pharmacoepidemiology. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0470029244Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Drugi nazivimatched post-marketing surveillance study, Phase IV matched cohort study, matched pharmacoepidemiological study, post-authorization matched safety studyPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Srodne53
SažetakA Matched Phase IV study is a post-marketing observational design in which patients who received an approved drug (or intervention) are matched to comparable non-exposed patients — or patients on an alternative therapy — to evaluate real-world safety, effectiveness, or long-term outcomes. Conducted after regulatory approval, it combines the epidemiological rigour of matching with the breadth of post-authorization pharmacovigilance, generating evidence that randomized trials are rarely powered or timed to provide.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretraživanje Preuzmi prezentaciju

ScholarGateUsporedite metode: Matched Phase IV Study · Propensity Score Matching. Preuzeto 2026-06-18 s https://scholargate.app/hr/compare