ScholarGate
Asistent

Usporedite metode

Pregledajte odabrane metode jednu uz drugu; retci koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Dnevnik istraživanja licem u lice×Refleksivna tematska analiza×
PodručjeMetodologija anketaKvalitativno
ObiteljProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka1981–1989 (systematic articulation in qualitative fieldwork literature)2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
TvoracRobert G. Burgess (systematic research diary in fieldwork); Mary Louise Holly (professional journal writing)Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
VrstaQualitative data collection and reflexivity toolQualitative research method
Temeljni izvorHolly, M. L. (1989). Writing to Grow: Keeping a Personal-Professional Journal. Heinemann. ISBN: 978-0435084592Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Drugi naziviin-person research journal, fieldwork reflexive diary, face-to-face researcher journal, in-person reflexive logRTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Srodne66
SažetakA face-to-face research diary is a systematic reflexive log maintained by the researcher during in-person fieldwork. Unlike participant diaries, this is the researcher's own running record of observations, analytic thoughts, methodological decisions, and emotional responses captured during or immediately after direct, embodied encounters with participants or field settings. It serves simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument within qualitative research.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretraživanje Preuzmi prezentaciju

ScholarGateUsporedite metode: Face-to-face Research Diary · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Preuzeto 2026-06-19 s https://scholargate.app/hr/compare