ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelineRisk-and-protective-factor frameworks

Risk and Resilience Assessment

Risk and resilience assessment is an ecological approach to understanding why some people exposed to adversity fare poorly while others do well, by identifying the risk factors that increase the likelihood of negative outcomes and the protective factors that buffer against them, across individual, family, and environmental levels. Articulated for social work by Mark Fraser and colleagues, it shifts assessment from cataloguing deficits to weighing the dynamic balance of vulnerabilities and strengths, and uses that balance to target interventions that reduce risk and bolster protection.

Ouvrir dans MethodMindBientôtAppliquer, comparer, obtenir des conseils
Outils et ressources
Télécharger les diapositives
Apprendre et explorer
VidéoBientôt

Lire la méthode complète

Réservé aux membres

Connectez-vous avec un compte gratuit pour lire cette section.

Se connecter

Carte des méthodes

Le voisinage des méthodes apparentées — sélectionnez un nœud pour explorer.

Sources

  1. Fraser, M. W., Richman, J. M., & Galinsky, M. J. (1999). Risk, protection, and resilience: Toward a conceptual framework for social work practice. Social Work Research, 23(3), 131–143. DOI: 10.1093/swr/23.3.131
  2. Fraser, M. W. (Ed.). (2004). Risk and Resilience in Childhood: An Ecological Perspective (2nd ed.). NASW Press. ISBN: 9780871013569

Comment citer cette page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Risk and Resilience Assessment in Social Work Practice. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fr/social-work/risk-and-resilience-assessment

Quelle méthode ?

Placez cette méthode aux côtés de ses plus proches parentes et lisez-les côte à côte — la bibliothèque pose les ouvrages sur la table ; le choix vous revient.

Comparer côte à côte
ScholarGateRisk and Resilience Assessment (Risk and Resilience Assessment in Social Work Practice). Consulté le 2026-06-24 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/social-work/risk-and-resilience-assessment · Jeu de données : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026