ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Valeur à Risque (VaR)×Valeur à risque conditionnelle (Expected Shortfall)×
DomaineFinanceFinance
FamilleRegression modelRegression model
Année d'origine20072000
Auteur d'origineJorion (textbook benchmark); popularised by RiskMetrics / J.P. MorganRockafellar & Uryasev (2000); Acerbi & Tasche (2002)
TypeFinancial risk measureCoherent tail-risk measure
Source fondatriceJorion, P. (2007). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0071464956Rockafellar, R. T. & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk. Journal of Risk, 2(3), 21-41. DOI ↗
AliasVaR, value-at-risk, delta-normal VaR, historical simulation VaRCVaR, expected shortfall, average value-at-risk, tail VaR
Apparentées55
RésuméValue at Risk is a financial risk measure that estimates the maximum loss a position or portfolio could suffer over a fixed holding period at a given confidence level. It is the standard benchmark in risk management and regulatory capital calculations, developed in the textbook tradition of Jorion (2007) and the Basel market-risk framework.Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), also called Expected Shortfall, is a coherent tail-risk measure that quantifies the conditional expectation of losses beyond the Value-at-Risk threshold. It was introduced for optimization by Rockafellar and Uryasev (2000) and shown to be coherent by Acerbi and Tasche (2002), and it has replaced VaR as the regulatory standard under Basel III/IV.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Value at Risk · Conditional Value-at-Risk. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare