Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Évaluation d'Impact Contrefactuel Spatial (EICS)× | Régression Pondérée Géographiquement (GWR)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Inférence causale | Analyse spatiale |
| Famille | Regression model | Regression model |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2010s | 2002 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Cerqua, Pellegrini, and regional-science scholars building on counterfactual econometrics | Fotheringham, Brunsdon & Charlton |
| Type≠ | Quasi-experimental / causal inference | Local spatial regression |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Cerqua, A., & Pellegrini, G. (2014). Do subsidies to private capital boost firms' growth? A multiple regression discontinuity design approach. Journal of Public Economics, 109, 114-126. DOI ↗ | Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471496168 |
| Alias | SCIE, spatial CIE, place-based counterfactual evaluation, regional counterfactual analysis | GWR, local regression, spatially varying coefficient regression, Coğrafi Ağırlıklı Regresyon (GWR) |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Spatial Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (SCIE) is a family of quasi-experimental methods that estimate the causal effect of geographically targeted policies — such as EU Cohesion Funds, enterprise zones, or place-based subsidies — by constructing a spatial counterfactual: what outcomes the treated region would have experienced without the intervention, inferred from comparable untreated regions or from discontinuities at policy boundaries. | Geographically Weighted Regression is a local regression method, introduced by Fotheringham, Brunsdon and Charlton (2002), that allows the regression coefficients to vary across space. Instead of one global equation, it fits a separate set of coefficients at every location, capturing spatial heterogeneity in the relationships. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|