ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Essai clinique rétrospectif de phase II×Essai clinique de phase II×
DomaineÉpidémiologieÉpidémiologie
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1980s–1990s (with growth in oncology retrospective analyses)1960s–1970s (formalised in US federal drug regulation)
Auteur d'origineAdapted from standard Phase II trial methodology; retrospective variant formalized in oncology practiceU.S. Food and Drug Administration / ICH E8 guidelines (institutionalised framework)
TypeObservational retrospective studyInterventional clinical study design
Source fondatriceSimon, R. (1989). Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 10(1), 1–10. DOI ↗Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185392
Aliasretrospective Phase II study, historical Phase II analysis, retrospective efficacy study, Phase II retrospective analysisPhase 2 trial, Phase II study, early efficacy trial, proof-of-concept trial
Apparentées56
RésuméA retrospective Phase II clinical trial evaluates a treatment's preliminary efficacy and safety signals using existing archival data — medical records, registries, or electronic health records — rather than prospectively enrolling new patients. It mirrors the objectives of a standard Phase II trial (estimating response rate, tolerability, and early efficacy) but does so by looking backward at patients who have already received the intervention, making it faster and less costly than a prospective design.A Phase II clinical trial is the second stage in the drug or intervention development pipeline, conducted after Phase I safety testing. Its primary goal is to assess whether the intervention shows preliminary efficacy signals in a relevant patient population at the dose established in Phase I, while continuing to characterise the safety and tolerability profile. Phase II trials are generally smaller than Phase III confirmatory trials and serve as critical go/no-go decision points before large-scale investment.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Retrospective phase II clinical trial · Phase II clinical trial. Consulté le 2026-06-20 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare