Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Longstaff-Schwartz Method× | Valorisation neutre au risque× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Finance quantitative | Finance quantitative |
| Famille≠ | Machine learning | Regression model |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2001 | 1979 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Francis A. Longstaff and Eduardo S. Schwartz | John Harrison and David Kreps |
| Type≠ | Valuation Algorithm | Fundamental Principle |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Longstaff, F. A., & Schwartz, E. S. (2001). Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach. Review of Financial Studies, 14(1), 113-147. DOI ↗ | Harrison, J. M., & Kreps, D. M. (1979). Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets. Journal of Economic Theory, 20(3), 381-408. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | LSM, Least-Squares MC, Optimal Stopping | Risk-Neutral Measure, Q-Measure |
| Apparentées | 4 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | The Longstaff-Schwartz method (2001) is a Monte Carlo algorithm for pricing American options and Bermudan swaptions by approximating the optimal exercise boundary via least-squares regression. It has become the industry standard for pricing path-dependent derivatives where analytical solutions do not exist. | Risk-neutral valuation (1979) is the fundamental principle that derivative prices equal the expected payoff discounted at the risk-free rate, computed under a risk-neutral probability measure (Q-measure). This principle, formalized by Harrison and Kreps, eliminates the need to estimate risk premia and is the foundation of modern derivatives pricing. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|