Comparer des méthodes

	Validité Nomologique Longitudinale	Validité de construit
Domaine	Psychométrie	Psychométrie
Famille	Latent structure	Latent structure
Année d'origine	1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s	1955
Auteur d'origine	Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onward	Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
Type	Validity evaluation	Validity evaluation framework
Source fondatrice	Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.	Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
Alias	longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validity	construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Apparentées	6	6
Résumé	Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time.	Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.