ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Cadre HJM×Valorisation neutre au risque×
DomaineFinance quantitativeFinance quantitative
FamilleRegression modelRegression model
Année d'origine19921979
Auteur d'origineDavid Heath, Robert Jarrow, and Andrew MortonJohn Harrison and David Kreps
TypeInterest Rate FrameworkFundamental Principle
Source fondatriceHeath, D., Jarrow, R. A., & Morton, A. (1992). Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: A new methodology for contingent claims valuation. Econometrica, 60(1), 77-105. DOI ↗Harrison, J. M., & Kreps, D. M. (1979). Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets. Journal of Economic Theory, 20(3), 381-408. DOI ↗
AliasForward Rate Model, No-Arbitrage Drift ConditionRisk-Neutral Measure, Q-Measure
Apparentées44
RésuméThe Heath-Jarrow-Morton (HJM) framework (1992) is a general no-arbitrage approach to modeling the entire term structure of forward rates. Unlike short-rate models, HJM works directly with forward rates f(t,T) and specifies their volatility; the drift is then determined by arbitrage constraints. This flexibility enables multi-factor modeling and accurate calibration to swaption matrices.Risk-neutral valuation (1979) is the fundamental principle that derivative prices equal the expected payoff discounted at the risk-free rate, computed under a risk-neutral probability measure (Q-measure). This principle, formalized by Harrison and Kreps, eliminates the need to estimate risk premia and is the foundation of modern derivatives pricing.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: HJM Framework · Risk-Neutral Valuation. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare