Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Test de spécification de Hausman (FE vs RE)× | Modèle à effets aléatoires pour données de panel× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Économétrie | Économétrie |
| Famille | Regression model | Regression model |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1978 | 2021 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Jerry A. Hausman | Baltagi (textbook treatment); classical random-effects panel estimator |
| Type≠ | Specification test for panel data models | Panel data regression |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. DOI ↗ | Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (6th ed.). Springer. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | Hausman specification test, FE vs RE test, Durbin-Wu-Hausman test, Hausman Spesifikasyon Testi (FE vs RE) | random effects panel model, RE estimator, GLS random effects, Panel Veri — Rassal Etkiler Modeli |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | The Hausman test is a specification test, introduced by Jerry A. Hausman in 1978, that decides between the fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) estimators in panel data models. The null hypothesis is that the random-effects estimator is consistent and efficient and should be preferred; the alternative is that random effects is inconsistent and fixed effects is required because the unit-specific effects are correlated with the explanatory variables. | The Random Effects model is a panel-data regression that treats unobserved individual heterogeneity as a random component drawn from a common distribution, rather than a separate parameter for each unit. It is a standard estimator in panel econometrics, developed in textbook treatments such as Baltagi's Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (2021). |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|