Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Estimateur des variables instrumentales d'Anderson-Hsiao× | Méthode des variables instrumentales (VI) pour l'inférence causale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Économétrie | Économie de la santé |
| Famille≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1981 | 1990s (modern applications) |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Theodore Anderson & Cheng Hsiao | Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory |
| Type≠ | Instrumental variables estimator for dynamic panel data | Method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1981). Estimation of dynamic models with error components. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(375), 598–606. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| Alias | Anderson-Hsiao Estimator, AH IV Estimator, Dynamic Panel IV Estimator, Anderson-Hsiao Araçsal Değişken Tahmincisi | IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation |
| Apparentées≠ | 2 | 3 |
| Résumé≠ | The Anderson-Hsiao IV estimator is a method for consistently estimating dynamic panel data models that include a lagged dependent variable as a regressor. Proposed by Theodore Anderson and Cheng Hsiao in 1981, it resolves the Nickell bias that arises when fixed effects are eliminated by first-differencing, by instrumenting the differenced lagged dependent variable with its own second lag in levels or differences. | Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|