ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Expérience factorielle fractionnaire adaptative×Planification Composite Centrale×
DomainePlans d'expériencesPlans d'expériences
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1950s–1960s (classical FFD); adaptive extensions formalized in 1990s–2000s1951
Auteur d'origineBox, Hunter, and collaborators (adaptive/sequential extension of classical fractional factorial work)George E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson
TypeExperimental design strategyResponse surface experimental design
Source fondatriceBox, G. E. P., Hunter, J. S., & Hunter, W. G. (2005). Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery (2nd ed.). Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 978-0471718130Box, G. E. P., & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 13(1), 1–45. DOI ↗
Aliasadaptive FFE, sequential fractional factorial design, adaptive screening design, adaptive factor screeningCCD, Box-Wilson design, central composite response surface design, rotatable central composite design
Apparentées23
RésuméAn adaptive fractional factorial experiment combines the resource-efficiency of fractional factorial designs with a sequential, data-driven strategy for selecting which factors and interactions to investigate next. Rather than committing all experimental runs upfront, the researcher analyses results from an initial fraction and uses those findings to guide subsequent rounds of experimentation — augmenting, folding, or redirecting the design until the active factors and optimal settings are identified with sufficient precision.Central Composite Design (CCD) is a second-order response surface design that allows researchers to efficiently fit a full quadratic model relating multiple continuous input factors to one or more response variables. Introduced by Box and Wilson in 1951, it combines a factorial (or fractional factorial) core, axial (star) points, and center-point replicates into a single unified design, making it the most widely used design for process optimization in engineering, chemistry, and manufacturing.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Adaptive Fractional Factorial Experiment · Central Composite Design. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare