False Consensus Paradigm
The false consensus paradigm, established by Ross, Greene, and House in 1977, demonstrates a pervasive bias in social perception: people overestimate the extent to which others share their own choices, beliefs, and behaviors. In the canonical procedure, participants indicate their own position on some issue or choice -- famously, whether they would walk around campus wearing a sandwich-board sign -- and then estimate what proportion of their peers would do the same. The signature finding is that those who choose a given option estimate that option to be more common than do those who reject it, so each group projects its own response onto others. Ross and colleagues also showed that people view their own responses as relatively common and unrevealing of personality while seeing differing responses as uncommon and diagnostic of others' traits. The paradigm became a foundational demonstration of egocentric bias in social judgment and attribution.
Lue koko menetelmä
Kirjaudu sisään maksuttomalla tilillä lukeaksesi tämän osion.
Menetelmäkartta
Lähimenetelmien naapurusto — valitse solmu tutkiaksesi.
Lähteet
- Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The 'false consensus effect': An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279-301. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X ↗
Näin viittaat tähän sivuun
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). False Consensus Effect Paradigm. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fi/social-psychology/false-consensus-paradigm
Mikä menetelmä?
Aseta tämä menetelmä lähimpien sukulaistensa rinnalle ja lue niitä yhdessä — kirjasto asettaa teokset pöydälle; valinta on sinun.
- Bogus PipelineSosiaalipsykologia↔ vertaa
- Minimal Group ParadigmSosiaalipsykologia↔ vertaa
- Stereotype Content ModelSosiaalipsykologia↔ vertaa
Tähän viittaavat
Samankaltaiset menetelmät
Huomasitko virheen tällä sivulla? Ilmoita siitä tai ehdota korjausta →