ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Dumitrescu-Hurlin paneeli-Granger-kausaatiotesti×Granger-kausaatiotesti×Kónya Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality×Paneeliaineiston kiinteiden vaikutusten malli×
TieteenalaEkonometriaEkonometriaEkonometriaEkonometria
MenetelmäperheHypothesis testRegression modelHypothesis testRegression model
Syntyvuosi2012196920062014
KehittäjäElena-Ivona Dumitrescu & Christophe HurlinClive W. J. GrangerLászló KónyaHsiao (textbook treatment); within transformation of panel data
TyyppiNon-causality test for heterogeneous panelsTime-series predictive causality testNon-parametric bootstrap hypothesis testPanel data regression
AlkuperäislähdeDumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. DOI ↗Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. DOI ↗Kónya, L. (2006). Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 23(6), 978–992. DOI ↗Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗
RinnakkaisnimetDH Causality Test, Panel Granger Causality Test (Heterogeneous), Dumitrescu-Hurlin Test, Heterojen Panel Nedensellik TestiGranger causality test, Granger non-causality test, predictive causality test, Granger Nedensellik TestiBootstrap Panel Causality Test, Kónya Panel Granger Causality, SUR-Based Bootstrap Causality, Kónya Önyükleme Nedensellik Testifixed effects model, within estimator, panel fixed-effects regression, Panel Veri — Sabit Etkiler Modeli
Liittyvät3535
TiivistelmäThe Dumitrescu-Hurlin (DH) test, introduced by Elena-Ivona Dumitrescu and Christophe Hurlin in their 2012 Economic Modelling article, tests for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panel datasets. Unlike standard panel causality approaches, it permits each cross-sectional unit to have its own distinct causal relationship, making it well-suited for macro-panels of countries, firms, or regions where homogeneity cannot be assumed.The Granger causality test, introduced by Clive W. J. Granger in 1969, assesses whether the past values of one time series help predict another beyond what the latter's own past already explains. It defines causality in a strictly predictive sense rather than as a structural or physical cause.Introduced by László Kónya in 2006, this method tests Granger causality in heterogeneous panels by estimating a Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR) system and deriving country-specific critical values through bootstrapping. Unlike pooled panel tests, it delivers a separate causality verdict for each cross-section, making it particularly valuable in applied macroeconomics and international economics when panel units are expected to behave differently.The Panel Data Fixed Effects model estimates relationships from panel data (the same units observed over several time periods) while controlling for unit- and/or time-specific effects, supporting causal inference. It is developed as the within estimator in standard treatments such as Hsiao's Analysis of Panel Data (2014).
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Dumitrescu-Hurlin Causality · Granger Causality · Kónya Bootstrap Causality · Panel Fixed Effects. Haettu 2026-06-18 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare