Comparative Public Administration
Comparative public administration is the systematic study of administrative systems across countries, regions or historical periods in order to explain similarities and differences in how states organise and run their bureaucracies. Fred Riggs, a pioneer of the field, argued in his 1964 Theory of Prismatic Society that administration cannot be understood apart from its ecological context — the social, economic, political and cultural environment in which it is embedded. The method compares administrative structures, behaviours and performance while situating each case in its setting, guarding against the assumption that arrangements which work in one country will transfer to another. Its purpose is to build generalisable knowledge about administration that is sensitive to context rather than ethnocentric.
مطالعهٔ کامل روش
برای خواندن این بخش با حساب رایگان وارد شوید.
نقشهٔ روش
همسایگی روشهای مرتبط — برای کاوش، یک گره را برگزینید.
منابع
- Riggs, F. W. (1964). Administration in Developing Countries: The Theory of Prismatic Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 9780395067352
- Heady, F. (2001). Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective (6th ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker. ISBN: 9780824746483
نحوهٔ استناد به این صفحه
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Comparative Public Administration Analysis Across Systems. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fa/public-administration/comparative-public-administration
کدام روش؟
این روش را در کنار نزدیکترین روشهای خویشاوندش بگذارید و آنها را کنار هم بخوانید — کتابخانه کتابها را روی میز میگشاید؛ انتخاب با شماست.
- Accountability Mechanism AnalysisPublic Administration↔ مقایسه
- Collaborative Governance AssessmentPublic Administration↔ مقایسه
- Policy Implementation AnalysisPublic Administration↔ مقایسه
- Transaction Cost Analysis in the Public SectorPublic Administration↔ مقایسه
ارجاعشده در
روشهای مشابه
در این صفحه مشکلی دیدید؟ گزارش دهید یا اصلاحی پیشنهاد کنید →