Critical Incident Technique in Information Behavior
The Critical Incident Technique (CIT), set out by John Flanagan in his 1954 Psychological Bulletin article, is a flexible set of procedures for collecting first-hand accounts of specific, observable incidents that were especially helpful or unhelpful in achieving some aim, and content-analyzing them to understand effective and ineffective behaviour. In library and information science it has become a widely used method for studying information seeking and use: instead of asking people in the abstract how they look for information, researchers ask them to recount concrete recent episodes — a time they urgently needed information, succeeded or failed to find it, encountered a barrier, or used a source to good or ill effect. Analyzing many such incidents yields grounded categories of information needs, behaviours, barriers and source roles. A 2025 Libri review documents the technique's broad application across LIS information-behaviour research.
مطالعهٔ کامل روش
برای خواندن این بخش با حساب رایگان وارد شوید.
نقشهٔ روش
همسایگی روشهای مرتبط — برای کاوش، یک گره را برگزینید.
منابع
- Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327-358. DOI: 10.1037/h0061470 ↗
- Sadeghi, H., Nowkarizi, M., & Tajafari, M. (2025). Applications of the Critical Incident Technique in Library and Information Science Research: A Literature Review. Libri, 75(2), 145-157. DOI: 10.1515/libri-2024-0065 ↗
نحوهٔ استناد به این صفحه
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Critical Incident Technique in Information Behavior (Flanagan's CIT Applied to Information Seeking and Use). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fa/library-information-science/critical-incident-technique-lis
کدام روش؟
این روش را در کنار نزدیکترین روشهای خویشاوندش بگذارید و آنها را کنار هم بخوانید — کتابخانه کتابها را روی میز میگشاید؛ انتخاب با شماست.
- Information Encountering AnalysisLibrary Information Science↔ مقایسه
- Information Horizons MappingLibrary Information Science↔ مقایسه
- Sense-Making MethodologyLibrary Information Science↔ مقایسه
ارجاعشده در
روشهای مشابه
در این صفحه مشکلی دیدید؟ گزارش دهید یا اصلاحی پیشنهاد کنید →