ScholarGate
Asistente
Process / pipelineNetwork and collaborative governance studies

Collaborative Governance Assessment

Collaborative governance assessment is a framework for analysing arrangements in which public agencies and non-state stakeholders deliberate together to make or implement public policy by consensus. Synthesised by Chris Ansell and Alison Gash in their 2008 article from a meta-analysis of over a hundred cases, it identifies the starting conditions, institutional design and facilitative leadership that feed into an iterative collaborative process and ultimately shape outcomes. The framework treats collaboration not as a single event but as a cycle of face-to-face dialogue, trust-building, shared understanding and intermediate commitments. Its purpose is to explain why some multi-stakeholder partnerships succeed while others stall or collapse.

Abrir en MethodMindPróximamenteAplicar, comparar, obtener orientación
Herramientas y recursos
Descargar diapositivas
Aprender y explorar
VídeoPróximamente

Leer el método completo

Solo para miembros

Inicia sesión con una cuenta gratuita para leer esta sección.

Iniciar sesión

Mapa de métodos

El vecindario de métodos relacionados: selecciona un nodo para explorarlo.

Fuentes

  1. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum032

Cómo citar esta página

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Collaborative Governance Assessment Framework. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/es/public-administration/collaborative-governance-assessment

¿Qué método?

Coloca este método junto a sus parientes más cercanos y léelos lado a lado: la biblioteca pone los libros sobre la mesa; la elección es tuya.

Comparar lado a lado

Citado por

ScholarGateCollaborative Governance Assessment (Collaborative Governance Assessment Framework). Recuperado el 2026-06-24 de https://scholargate.app/es/public-administration/collaborative-governance-assessment · Conjunto de datos: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026