Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Statistics›Mann-Whitney U test
Hypothesis test

Mann-Whitney U test

Also known as: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Mann-Whitney U Testi

The Mann-Whitney U test is the nonparametric alternative to the independent samples t-test, comparing two independent groups by ranking all observations together rather than relying on their means. It was introduced by H. B. Mann and D. R. Whitney in 1947 and does not require the data to be normally distributed.

ScholarGate
  1. Hypothesis test
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Mann-Whitney U test
Independent t-testKruskal-Wallis testPermutation TestWilcoxon signed-rank testBayesian t-TestBrunner-Munzel TestDunn TestEquivalence Test (TOST)Jonckheere-Terpstra TestKendall Tau Correlation

+9 more

When to use it

Use it to compare exactly two independent groups when the outcome is at least ordinal and normality cannot be assumed — for instance with skewed continuous data, Likert-type scales, or small samples. Observations must be independent, and at least ten cases overall are recommended; below that the normal approximation to U becomes unreliable and a permutation test is preferable. If you wish to interpret the result specifically as a difference in medians, the two groups should have similar distribution shapes.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Distribution-free: no normality assumption, so it is robust to skew and outliers.
  • Works with ordinal data and ranked continuous outcomes where the t-test is inappropriate.
  • Simple, widely accepted, and available in every analysis package.
Limitations
  • Interpreting the result as a median comparison requires the two groups to have similar distribution shapes.
  • The normal approximation to U is unreliable for very small samples (fewer than about ten observations).
  • Limited to comparing exactly two independent groups.

Frequently asked

Does the test compare medians or distributions?

Strictly it tests whether one group is stochastically larger than the other. It can be read as a median comparison only when the two groups share a similar distribution shape; otherwise it reflects a broader difference between the distributions.

How does it relate to the Wilcoxon rank-sum test?

They are the same procedure. Mann and Whitney (1947) formulated the U statistic, while Wilcoxon (1945) introduced the equivalent rank-sum statistic, so the two names refer to one test.

What is the minimum sample size?

At least ten observations overall is recommended. With fewer cases the normal approximation to the U distribution breaks down and the p-value becomes unreliable; an exact permutation test is the safer choice.

How do I report an effect size?

Convert the test statistic to a standardised Z and report r = |Z| / √N, where N is the total sample size. Reporting a 95% confidence interval alongside it is recommended.

Sources

  1. Mann, H. B. & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60. DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177730491 ↗
  2. Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). SAGE. ISBN: 978-1446249185

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Mann-Whitney U test. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/statistics/mann-whitney-u

Related methods

Independent t-testKruskal-Wallis testPermutation TestWilcoxon signed-rank test

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Independent t-testStatistics↔ compare
  • Kruskal-Wallis testStatistics↔ compare
  • Permutation TestStatistics↔ compare
  • Wilcoxon signed-rank testStatistics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Bayesian t-TestBrunner-Munzel TestDunn TestEquivalence Test (TOST)Independent t-testJonckheere-Terpstra TestKendall Tau CorrelationKruskal-Wallis testRuns TestSiegel-Tukey testSign TestSomers' DSpearman CorrelationTrimmed Mean TestTwo-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov TestVan der Waerden TestWelch t-testWilcoxon signed-rank test

Similar methods

Robust Mann-Whitney U testNonparametric Statistical TestsBayesian Mann-Whitney U testBrunner-Munzel TestWilcoxon signed-rank testKruskal-Wallis testRobust Wilcoxon signed-rank testIndependent samples t-test

Related reference concepts

Rank-Based MethodsNonparametric StatisticsMultivariate Analysis of VariancePermutation TestsCorrelation and CovarianceStatistical Hypothesis Testing

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Mann-Whitney U test (Mann-Whitney U test). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/statistics/mann-whitney-u · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
H. B. Mann & D. R. Whitney
Year
1947
Family
Hypothesis test
Type
Nonparametric two-group comparison
Groups
2
Outcome
ordinal or continuous (ranked)
Parametric
No
Distribution
Mann-Whitney U (normal approximation for large samples)
Related methods
Independent t-testKruskal-Wallis testPermutation TestWilcoxon signed-rank test
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account