Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Statistics›Kendall Tau Rank Correlation
Hypothesis test

Kendall Tau Rank Correlation

Kendall Tau Rank Correlation Coefficient · Also known as: Kendall's tau, Kendall tau-b, tau correlation, Kendall Tau Korelasyonu

Kendall Tau is a nonparametric rank correlation coefficient introduced by Maurice G. Kendall in 1938 to measure the strength and direction of a monotone association between two ordinal or continuous variables. It is particularly suited to small samples and datasets containing many tied ranks, where the Spearman coefficient can be less stable.

ScholarGate
  1. Hypothesis test
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Kendall Tau Correlation
Mann-Whitney U testPearson CorrelationSpearman CorrelationWilcoxon signed-rank testRobust CorrelationRobust Pearson correlati…

When to use it

Use Kendall Tau when you want to assess the monotone relationship between two variables measured on at least an ordinal scale and you cannot assume normality. It is especially appropriate when the sample is small (as few as 10 observations) or when there are many tied values in the data. Both variables must be ordinal or continuous; the relationship is assumed to be monotone (consistently increasing or decreasing) rather than strictly linear. If the data are continuous, approximately normal, and you expect a linear relationship, Pearson correlation is more powerful. If there are few ties and the sample is reasonably large, Spearman correlation is a close alternative and easier to compute by hand.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Robust to outliers and violations of normality because it uses only rank information.
  • Handles many tied ranks gracefully through the tau-b correction.
  • Reliable in small samples where other correlation measures become unstable.
  • The coefficient has a direct probability interpretation: tau equals the probability of concordance minus the probability of discordance.
Limitations
  • Less statistically powerful than Pearson correlation when normality holds and the relationship is linear.
  • Computationally more demanding than Spearman for large datasets, though this is negligible with modern software.
  • Only captures monotone associations; it will underestimate or miss non-monotone (e.g. U-shaped) relationships.

Frequently asked

What is the difference between tau-a and tau-b?

Tau-a uses the total number of pairs in the denominator without adjusting for ties. Tau-b corrects for ties in each variable separately, yielding a coefficient that can still reach ±1 when ties are present. Most software reports tau-b by default, and it is the appropriate form for most real datasets.

How does Kendall Tau compare to Spearman's rho?

Both are nonparametric rank correlations, but they weight pair relationships differently. Tau is generally smaller in magnitude than rho for the same data and has a cleaner probability interpretation. Tau is more robust in very small samples or when ties are frequent; rho is numerically simpler to compute and slightly more powerful in large, tie-free samples.

What sample size do I need?

A minimum of 10 observations is required for asymptotic p-values to be reasonable. With fewer than 10 observations, use exact permutation p-values. Kendall Tau is one of the few correlation measures specifically recommended for samples in the range of 10–30, where Pearson is unreliable and Spearman can be unstable.

What if my p-value is significant but tau is very small?

In large samples even a trivially small tau will produce a significant p-value. Always report the tau coefficient alongside the p-value so readers can judge practical significance. A tau of 0.05 may be statistically significant yet practically meaningless.

Sources

  1. Kendall, M. G. (1938). A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30(1–2), 81–93. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Kendall Tau Rank Correlation Coefficient. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/statistics/kendall-tau

Related methods

Mann-Whitney U testPearson CorrelationSpearman CorrelationWilcoxon signed-rank test

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Mann-Whitney U testStatistics↔ compare
  • Pearson CorrelationStatistics↔ compare
  • Spearman CorrelationStatistics↔ compare
  • Wilcoxon signed-rank testStatistics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Pearson CorrelationRobust CorrelationRobust Pearson correlationSpearman Correlation

Similar methods

Kendall's tauRobust Kendall's tauRobust CorrelationSpearman CorrelationPearson CorrelationRobust Spearman CorrelationSomers' DMann-Whitney U test

Related reference concepts

Correlation and CovarianceRank-Based MethodsChi-Squared and Fisher Exact TestsAssociation MeasuresCorrelationNonparametric Statistics

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Kendall Tau Correlation (Kendall Tau Rank Correlation Coefficient). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/statistics/kendall-tau · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Maurice G. Kendall
Year
1938
Family
Nonparametric correlation
Type
Rank-based association measure
Outcome
ordinal or continuous
Parametric
No
Distribution
Asymptotic normal (large n); exact permutation (small n)
MinSample
10
MeasureRange
−1 to +1
Related methods
Mann-Whitney U testPearson CorrelationSpearman CorrelationWilcoxon signed-rank test
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account