Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Spatial analysis›Spatial Lag Model (SAR / Spatial Autoregressive)
Regression model

Spatial Lag Model (SAR / Spatial Autoregressive)

Spatial Autoregressive (SAR) / Spatial Lag Model · Also known as: SAR model, spatial autoregressive model, spatial lag, Uzamsal Gecikme Modeli (SAR / Spatial Lag)

The Spatial Lag Model is an autoregressive regression that assumes spatial dependence in the dependent variable itself: the outcome values of neighbouring units enter the model as an explanatory term (ρWy). It was formalised in Anselin's Spatial Econometrics (1988) and developed further by LeSage and Pace (2009), and it decomposes spillover effects into direct, indirect, and total impacts.

ScholarGate
  1. Regression model
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Spatial Lag Model
KrigingOLS RegressionPanel Fixed EffectsSpatial Durbin ModelSpatial Error ModelBayesian Geographically…Bayesian Multiscale Geog…Bayesian Spatial Durbin…Bayesian Spatial Lag Mod…Bayesian Spatial Panel M…

+28 more

When to use it

Use the spatial lag model with continuous, cross-sectional data that carry geographic coordinates, when there is reason to believe the outcome in one location is shaped by the outcomes of its neighbours (a substantive spillover). A reasonable sample is needed (at least about 50 units). It is appropriate when the spatial weights matrix W is correctly specified and an LM-Lag test is significant and favoured over the LM-Error test, indicating dependence in the dependent variable rather than in the errors.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Captures genuine spatial spillovers by modelling dependence directly in the dependent variable (ρWy).
  • Decomposes effects into direct, indirect, and total impacts, separating a unit's own response from feedback through its neighbours.
  • Maximum-likelihood (and IV/GMM) estimation gives consistent coefficients where OLS would be biased.
Limitations
  • Results hinge on a correctly specified spatial weights matrix W; a poorly chosen W misstates who the neighbours are.
  • The spatially lagged outcome is endogenous, so OLS is inconsistent and ML or IV/GMM is required.
  • Requires geographic coordinates and a reasonable sample size (at least about 50 units), and cannot be applied without spatial information.

Frequently asked

How is the spatial lag model different from the spatial error model?

The lag model puts spatial dependence in the dependent variable (ρWy), representing a substantive spillover where neighbours' outcomes affect one another. The spatial error model instead puts the dependence in the error term (λWu), representing unobserved common factors that correlate neighbours' errors. An LM-Lag versus LM-Error test helps decide which specification fits.

Why can't I just use OLS?

Because the spatially lagged outcome Wy is correlated with the error term, the lagged term is endogenous and OLS becomes inconsistent. The model is estimated by maximum likelihood, or alternatively by instrumental variables or GMM.

What is the spatial weights matrix W?

W is a matrix that defines the neighbourhood structure — which units are treated as neighbours and how strongly. Every result depends on it, so it must be specified deliberately (for example by contiguity or distance) and is assumed to be correctly defined and exogenous.

Why report direct, indirect, and total impacts?

Because of the feedback through ρWy, a change in a predictor affects a unit's own outcome (direct), the outcomes of its neighbours (indirect), and the sum of both (total). The raw β coefficients do not reflect these spillovers, so LeSage and Pace recommend interpreting the impact decomposition instead.

Sources

  1. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-7799-1 ↗
  2. LeSage, J. & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/9781420064254 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Spatial Autoregressive (SAR) / Spatial Lag Model. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/spatial-analysis/spatial-lag-model

Related methods

KrigingOLS RegressionPanel Fixed EffectsSpatial Durbin ModelSpatial Error Model

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • KrigingSpatial analysis↔ compare
  • OLS RegressionEconometrics↔ compare
  • Panel Fixed EffectsEconometrics↔ compare
  • Spatial Durbin ModelSpatial analysis↔ compare
  • Spatial Error ModelSpatial analysis↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Bayesian Geographically Weighted RegressionBayesian Multiscale Geographically Weighted RegressionBayesian Spatial Durbin ModelBayesian Spatial Lag ModelBayesian Spatial Panel ModelBayesian Spatial RegressionGeary's CGeographically Weighted Random ForestGeographically Weighted RegressionGetis-Ord Gi*Global Spatial Durbin ModelGlobal Spatial Panel ModelLISALocal Geographically Weighted RegressionLocal Spatial Lag ModelLocal Spatial RegressionMGWRMoran's IMultiscale Geographically Weighted RegressionNetwork EconometricsPanel Spatial Durbin ModelPanel Spatial Error ModelPanel Spatial RegressionRobust Universal KrigingSpace-Time Spatial AutocorrelationSpace-Time Spatial Durbin ModelSpace-Time Spatial Lag ModelSpace-Time Spatial Panel ModelSpace-Time Spatial RegressionSpatial Difference-in-DifferencesSpatial Error ModelSpatial Regression of CrimeSpatial SAC ModelSpatial Sensitivity Analysis for Causality

Similar methods

Spatial RegressionSpatial Durbin ModelSpatial Error ModelSpace-Time Spatial Lag ModelGlobal Spatial Durbin ModelBayesian Spatial Lag ModelSpatial Panel ModelLocal Spatial Lag Model

Related reference concepts

Cross-Sectional Models • Spatial Models • Treatment Effect Models • Quantile Regressions • Social Interaction ModelsCross-Sectional Models • Spatial Models • Treatment Effect Models • Quantile RegressionsStructural Equation ModelingSingle Equation Models • Single VariablesGeneral Regional EconomicsPanel Data Models • Spatio-temporal Models

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Spatial Lag Model (Spatial Autoregressive (SAR) / Spatial Lag Model). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/spatial-analysis/spatial-lag-model · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Anselin (textbook formalisation); LeSage & Pace
Year
1988
Type
Spatial autoregressive regression
Estimator
Maximum likelihood (or IV/GMM)
Outcome
continuous
DataStructure
cross-sectional with spatial coordinates
Related methods
KrigingOLS RegressionPanel Fixed EffectsSpatial Durbin ModelSpatial Error Model
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account