Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Spatial analysis›Spatial SAC Model
Regression modelSpatial econometrics

Spatial SAC Model

Spatial Autoregressive Combined (SAC) Model · Also known as: SARAR Model, Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances, Cliff-Ord Combined Model, Uzamsal Otoregresif Birleşik Model

The Spatial Autoregressive Combined (SAC) model, also known as the SARAR model, simultaneously accounts for spatial dependence in both the dependent variable and the error term. Formalized by LeSage and Pace (2009), the SAC model combines the spatial lag model and the spatial error model into a single framework, estimating two distinct spatial autoregressive parameters — one capturing substantive spatial interaction among outcomes and another capturing residual spatial correlation among disturbances.

ScholarGate
  1. Regression model
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Spatial SAC Model
Spatial Durbin ModelSpatial Error ModelSpatial Lag Model

When to use it

Use the SAC model when both substantive spatial interaction among outcomes and spatially structured residuals are theoretically plausible or detected by specification tests such as the Robust LM tests. It is appropriate for cross-sectional areal data where a meaningful spatial weights matrix can be constructed. Key assumptions include correct specification of W, homoskedastic errors conditional on spatial structure, and stationarity of the spatial processes. The SAC model is more demanding in data and computation than its nested alternatives; prefer the spatial lag or spatial error model when only one form of dependence is indicated by theory or diagnostics.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Simultaneously controls for two distinct sources of spatial dependence, reducing omitted-variable bias relative to simpler spatial models
  • Nests both the spatial lag and spatial error models as special cases, enabling formal likelihood ratio tests of model restrictions
  • Produces consistent and asymptotically efficient parameter estimates under correct specification via maximum likelihood
  • Flexible enough to capture complex real-world spatial data-generating processes in economics, epidemiology, and regional science
Limitations
  • Requires specification of a spatial weights matrix W, and results can be sensitive to that choice
  • Identification and precision of rho and lambda can be low when the two spatial processes are not well distinguished by the data
  • Computationally more intensive than the spatial lag or error model alone due to two log-determinant evaluations
  • Interpretation of direct, indirect, and total effects is more complex than in the spatial lag model alone

Frequently asked

How does the SAC model differ from the Spatial Durbin Model?

The Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) includes spatially lagged explanatory variables (WX) in addition to the spatial lag of y, whereas the SAC model combines a spatial lag of y with a spatial autoregressive error process. The SDM addresses spillovers in covariates; the SAC model addresses simultaneous spillovers in outcomes and residuals. Both are more general than the pure spatial lag or error model but through different generalizations.

Can rho and lambda both be statistically significant?

Yes. When the true data-generating process involves both substantive spatial interaction and spatially correlated disturbances, both parameters can be significantly different from zero. However, in finite samples with moderate spatial autocorrelation, the two parameters may be difficult to distinguish precisely, and it is advisable to rely on strong theoretical motivation and specification tests before interpreting both as meaningful.

What software can estimate the SAC model?

The SAC model is available in R through the spatialreg package (sacsarlm function) and the spdep package. Python users can use PySAL's spreg module (GM_Combo for GMM estimation or spreg.ML_Lag variants). Stata supports it via the spregress command with the disterror option. Matlab implementations are provided in LeSage and Pace's own spatial econometrics toolbox.

Sources

  1. LeSage, J., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. CRC Press. ISBN: 978-1-4200-6424-7

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Spatial Autoregressive Combined (SAC) Model. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/spatial-analysis/spatial-sac-model

Related methods

Spatial Durbin ModelSpatial Error ModelSpatial Lag Model

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Spatial Durbin ModelSpatial analysis↔ compare
  • Spatial Error ModelSpatial analysis↔ compare
  • Spatial Lag ModelSpatial analysis↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

Spatial Lag ModelSpatial RegressionSpatial Durbin ModelSpatial Error ModelSpace-Time Spatial Lag ModelGlobal Spatial Error ModelPanel Spatial Error ModelSpace-Time Spatial Error Model

Related reference concepts

Cross-Sectional Models • Spatial Models • Treatment Effect Models • Quantile Regressions • Social Interaction ModelsCross-Sectional Models • Spatial Models • Treatment Effect Models • Quantile RegressionsPanel Data Models • Spatio-temporal ModelsPanel Data Models • Spatio-temporal ModelsStructural Equation ModelingGeneral Regional Economics

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Spatial SAC Model (Spatial Autoregressive Combined (SAC) Model). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/spatial-analysis/spatial-sac-model · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
James LeSage & R. Kelley Pace
Year
2009
Type
Combined spatial dependence regression model
Subfamily
Spatial econometrics
Estimator
Maximum Likelihood or Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares
Parameters
Two spatial autoregressive parameters (rho, lambda)
Related methods
Spatial Durbin ModelSpatial Error ModelSpatial Lag Model
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account