Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Spatial analysis›Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR)
Regression model

Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR)

Also known as: GWR, local regression, spatially varying coefficient regression, Coğrafi Ağırlıklı Regresyon (GWR)

Geographically Weighted Regression is a local regression method, introduced by Fotheringham, Brunsdon and Charlton (2002), that allows the regression coefficients to vary across space. Instead of one global equation, it fits a separate set of coefficients at every location, capturing spatial heterogeneity in the relationships.

ScholarGate
  1. Regression model
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Geographically Weighted Regression
LISAMoran's IOLS RegressionSpatial Error ModelSpatial Lag ModelBayesian Geographically…Bayesian Multiscale Geog…Bayesian Spatial Durbin…Bayesian Spatial Error M…Bayesian Spatial Lag Mod…

+54 more

When to use it

Use GWR when each observation carries geographic coordinates (latitude/longitude) and you suspect that the effect of a predictor differs across space — that is, when relationships are spatially non-stationary. It needs a reasonable sample (at least about 50 observations) on cross-sectional, geo-referenced data, and the bandwidth must be selected by cross-validation. Beyond the usual regression assumptions, spatial autocorrelation should be checked. If no coordinates are available, GWR cannot be applied and standard OLS regression should be used instead.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Reveals spatial heterogeneity by estimating a separate set of coefficients at every location.
  • Produces mappable coefficient surfaces showing where and how a predictor's effect changes across space.
  • Captures local relationships that a single global regression would average away and hide.
Limitations
  • Requires geographic coordinates; without them the method cannot be applied and OLS is the fallback.
  • Results depend heavily on the bandwidth, which must be tuned by cross-validation.
  • Needs an adequate sample (about 50+) and can give unstable local estimates where data are sparse, and global regression assumptions plus spatial autocorrelation still need checking.

Frequently asked

How is GWR different from ordinary OLS regression?

OLS estimates one global set of coefficients assumed constant everywhere. GWR relaxes that, estimating coefficients that vary by location, so it can capture spatial heterogeneity that a single global model would miss.

What is the bandwidth and why does it matter?

The bandwidth controls how quickly the weight given to neighbouring observations decays with distance — effectively how local each regression is. A small bandwidth gives very local, more variable estimates; a large one approaches the global model. It should be chosen by cross-validation.

What data do I need for GWR?

You need geo-referenced, cross-sectional data with coordinates (latitude/longitude) for each observation and ideally at least about 50 observations. Without coordinates GWR cannot run.

What should I do if my data have no coordinates?

GWR is undefined without spatial coordinates. In that case use standard OLS regression, which estimates a single global relationship.

Sources

  1. Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471496168

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/spatial-analysis/geographically-weighted-regression

Related methods

LISAMoran's IOLS RegressionSpatial Error ModelSpatial Lag Model

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • LISASpatial analysis↔ compare
  • Moran's ISpatial analysis↔ compare
  • OLS RegressionEconometrics↔ compare
  • Spatial Error ModelSpatial analysis↔ compare
  • Spatial Lag ModelSpatial analysis↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Bayesian Geographically Weighted RegressionBayesian Multiscale Geographically Weighted RegressionBayesian Spatial Durbin ModelBayesian Spatial Error ModelBayesian Spatial Lag ModelBayesian Spatial Panel ModelBayesian Spatial RegressionBayesian Universal KrigingCo-krigingCokrigingGeographically Weighted PCAGeographically Weighted Random ForestGlobal Spatial Durbin ModelGlobal Spatial Error ModelGlobal Spatial Panel ModelHot Spot AnalysisInverse Distance WeightingKrigingLocal Geographically Weighted RegressionLocal Indicators of Spatial AssociationLocal KrigingLocal Network-Based Spatial AnalysisLocal Ordinary KrigingLocal Spatial Durbin ModelLocal Spatial Lag ModelLocal Spatial RegressionLocal Universal KrigingMGWRMoran's IMultiscale Geographically Weighted RegressionMultiscale Spatial AutocorrelationNetwork-Based Spatial AnalysisOrdinary KrigingPanel Geographically Weighted RegressionPanel KrigingPanel Multiscale Geographically Weighted RegressionPanel Spatial AutocorrelationPanel Spatial Durbin ModelPanel Spatial Error ModelPanel Spatial RegressionRobust Universal KrigingSpace-Time Network-Based Spatial AnalysisSpace-Time Spatial AutocorrelationSpace-Time Spatial Error ModelSpace-Time Spatial Lag ModelSpace-Time Spatial Panel ModelSpace-Time Spatial RegressionSpace-Time Universal KrigingSpatial AutocorrelationSpatial Causal Impact AnalysisSpatial Counterfactual Impact EvaluationSpatial Doubly Robust EstimationSpatial Durbin ModelSpatial Inverse Probability WeightingSpatial Panel ModelSpatial Propensity Score WeightingSpatial Regression of CrimeSpatial Sensitivity Analysis for CausalityUniversal Kriging

Similar methods

Local Geographically Weighted RegressionLocal Spatial RegressionMGWRMultiscale Geographically Weighted RegressionPanel Geographically Weighted RegressionPanel Multiscale Geographically Weighted RegressionBayesian Multiscale Geographically Weighted RegressionBayesian Geographically Weighted Regression

Related reference concepts

Regression and CorrelationMeta-RegressionMultiple Linear RegressionMultilevel and Partial Pooling ModelsCross-Sectional Models • Spatial Models • Treatment Effect Models • Quantile RegressionsLogistic Regression

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Geographically Weighted Regression (Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/spatial-analysis/geographically-weighted-regression · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Fotheringham, Brunsdon & Charlton
Year
2002
Type
Local spatial regression
Estimator
Locally weighted least squares
Outcome
continuous
Structure
cross-sectional (geo-referenced)
MinSample
50
Related methods
LISAMoran's IOLS RegressionSpatial Error ModelSpatial Lag Model
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account