ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelineIntergroup relations / social identity

Minimal Group Paradigm

The minimal group paradigm is an experimental procedure, introduced by Henri Tajfel and colleagues in 1971, that strips intergroup conflict down to its barest possible cause: mere categorization. Participants are sorted into two groups on a trivial or random basis (for example, an alleged preference for one painter over another, or a coin toss), never meet other members, gain nothing personally, and then allocate points between anonymous in-group and out-group members using structured reward matrices. The striking and repeatedly replicated finding is that people favor their own group even when the category is meaningless and favoritism brings them no material gain. The paradigm became the empirical cornerstone of social identity theory, demonstrating that the cognitive act of dividing the social world into 'us' and 'them' is itself sufficient to produce discrimination.

Open in MethodMindSoonApply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore
VideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Sources

  1. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149-178. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Minimal Group Paradigm (Tajfel Categorization Experiment). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/social-psychology/minimal-group-paradigm

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

Referenced by

ScholarGateMinimal Group Paradigm (Minimal Group Paradigm (Tajfel Categorization Experiment)). Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/social-psychology/minimal-group-paradigm · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026