ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelineConformity / social influence

Asch Conformity Paradigm

The Asch conformity paradigm, established by Solomon Asch in the 1950s, demonstrates the power of group pressure to make people publicly endorse a manifestly false judgment. A naive participant joins a group of confederates for a simple perceptual task -- matching the length of a standard line to one of three comparison lines, where the correct answer is obvious. On certain critical trials the confederates unanimously give the same wrong answer, and the experimenter measures how often the lone real participant goes along with the majority against the evidence of their own eyes. Asch found that a substantial proportion of participants conformed at least once, even on an unambiguous task, while systematic variations revealed that conformity rises with majority size up to a point and collapses when unanimity is broken. The paradigm became the canonical demonstration of normative social influence.

Open in MethodMindSoonApply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore
VideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Sources

  1. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1-70. DOI: 10.1037/h0093718

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Asch Conformity (Line Judgment) Paradigm. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/social-psychology/asch-conformity-paradigm

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

Referenced by

ScholarGateAsch Conformity Paradigm (Asch Conformity (Line Judgment) Paradigm). Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/social-psychology/asch-conformity-paradigm · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026