Process / pipelineethical-violations

Research Misconduct

Research misconduct comprises intentional or reckless fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, conducting, or reporting research. Formally defined by U.S. federal policy (42 CFR Part 93, Office of Research Integrity), misconduct is distinguished from honest error, negligence, and good-faith disagreements about research methods or interpretation. Misconduct undermines scientific integrity, harms subjects and institutions, wastes research resources, and erodes public trust in science. Allegations are investigated formally with due process; proven misconduct results in sanctions ranging from publication correction to career-ending bans.

Find Topic with PaperMindSoonVideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Sources

  1. U.S. Office of Research Integrity. (2005). Public Health Service Policy on Research Misconduct. 42 CFR Part 93. Federal Register. link
  2. National Science Foundation. (2007). NSF Research Misconduct Policy. PAPPG Significant Changes. link
  3. Retraction Watch. (2023). Anatomy of a Retraction: What Can We Learn From Retractions? Retractions database and analysis. link

Related methods

Referenced by

ScholarGateResearch Misconduct (Definition, Investigation, and Consequences of Research Misconduct). Retrieved 2026-06-04 from https://scholargate.app/en/research-ethics/research-misconduct