Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Research Design›Multilevel Mixed Methods Design — Integrating Data Across Levels of Analysis
Process / pipelineMixed methods design

Multilevel Mixed Methods Design — Integrating Data Across Levels of Analysis

Multilevel Mixed Methods Research Design · Also known as: multilevel MMR, nested mixed methods, hierarchical mixed methods design, cross-level mixed methods

Multilevel mixed methods design is a research approach that collects and integrates both quantitative and qualitative data at two or more distinct levels of a social or organizational hierarchy — for example, individuals nested within classrooms, classrooms within schools, or patients within healthcare teams. By pairing quantitative measurement of outcomes at one level with qualitative exploration of meaning at another, researchers gain a richer, more complete picture than either strand alone could provide.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Multilevel Mixed Methods Design
Concurrent Embedded Mixe…Concurrent Triangulation…Explanatory Sequential M…Exploratory Sequential M…Multiphase Mixed Methods…Case-Focused Mixed Metho…Concurrent Case-Focused…Concurrent Multilevel Mi…Concurrent Transformativ…Embedded mixed methods m…

+20 more

When to use it

Use multilevel mixed methods design when your research question is inherently nested — that is, when individuals, groups, and/or institutions are all part of the phenomenon and no single level of analysis is sufficient on its own. It is especially well-suited to educational research, health systems research, organizational studies, community-based interventions, and policy evaluation. Do not use this design if your data are collected at a single level of analysis, if you lack access to multiple levels, or if resource constraints make coordinating two or more strands across levels infeasible. A simpler concurrent or sequential design may be preferable when the hierarchical structure is not theoretically central to the research question.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Captures complexity by pairing the appropriate data type with each level of the hierarchy, yielding more complete understanding than a single-level or single-strand study.
  • Particularly powerful for evaluating interventions in nested settings (classrooms, clinics, organizations) where context at higher levels shapes outcomes at lower levels.
  • Supports both top-down (policy to practice) and bottom-up (individual experience to systemic pattern) explanations within the same study.
  • Flexible in sequencing — strands can run concurrently or one can inform the other, depending on what each level of analysis requires.
  • Produces findings that are directly relevant to multiple stakeholder audiences — practitioners, managers, and policymakers — simultaneously.
Limitations
  • Substantially more complex to design, manage, and report than single-level or single-strand designs; requires expertise in both quantitative multilevel analysis and qualitative methods.
  • Resource-intensive: multiple sampling frames, data collection instruments, and analytical procedures must be coordinated across levels.
  • Integration across levels is challenging — the units of analysis differ, making direct comparison or merging of findings methodologically demanding.
  • Access to data at all required levels is not always feasible, and gatekeeping at institutional levels can derail the design mid-study.
  • Reporting conventions are not fully standardized, which can complicate peer review and publication in journals that favor single-paradigm designs.

Frequently asked

Is multilevel mixed methods design the same as hierarchical linear modelling (HLM)?

No. HLM is a purely quantitative statistical technique for analyzing nested data. Multilevel mixed methods design is a broader research design framework that integrates both quantitative and qualitative data at multiple levels of analysis. HLM may be one of the quantitative tools used within the design, but the design itself involves qualitative strands and integration across levels that HLM alone cannot provide.

How many levels do I need for this design to be appropriate?

A minimum of two distinct levels is required — for example, individuals nested within groups, or groups nested within institutions. Three or more levels are common in educational and health systems research. The key criterion is that the research question is genuinely nested: outcomes or meanings at one level are shaped by or embedded in structures at another level.

Can I use a multilevel mixed methods design with a small sample?

At the quantitative level, small samples limit statistical power and the feasibility of multilevel modelling. However, the qualitative strand at another level can operate with a smaller purposive sample. The design is feasible with modest overall samples if the quantitative strand is descriptive rather than inferential, but researchers should be transparent about the limitations this places on generalizability of the quantitative findings.

How do I integrate findings across levels that use different units of analysis?

Integration is typically achieved through joint displays — visual matrices or tables that place quantitative and qualitative findings side by side for comparison — and through narrative integration that explicitly discusses convergence, divergence, and complementarity. Some researchers develop explanatory models in which findings at one level explain patterns observed at another. The integration step should be planned before data collection, not treated as an afterthought.

When should I prefer a simpler mixed methods design over a multilevel one?

Choose a simpler concurrent or sequential design when your research question does not require data at multiple levels of a hierarchy, when you lack access to multiple levels, or when resource and time constraints make a multilevel design unworkable. The added complexity of multilevel design is only justified when the nesting structure is theoretically central to understanding the phenomenon.

Sources

  1. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1483357829
  2. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761930129

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Multilevel Mixed Methods Research Design. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/research-design/multilevel-mixed-methods-design

Related methods

Concurrent Embedded Mixed Methods DesignConcurrent Triangulation Mixed Methods DesignExplanatory Sequential Mixed Methods DesignExploratory Sequential Mixed Methods DesignMultiphase Mixed Methods Design

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Concurrent Embedded Mixed Methods DesignResearch Design↔ compare
  • Concurrent Triangulation Mixed Methods DesignResearch Design↔ compare
  • Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods DesignResearch Design↔ compare
  • Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods DesignResearch Design↔ compare
  • Multiphase Mixed Methods DesignResearch Design↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Case-Focused Mixed Methods DesignConcurrent Case-Focused Mixed MethodsConcurrent Embedded Mixed Methods DesignConcurrent Multilevel Mixed MethodsConcurrent Transformative Mixed MethodsEmbedded mixed methods meta-inferenceEmbedded Multilevel Mixed MethodsEmbedded Pragmatic Mixed MethodsEmbedded Qualitative-Priority Mixed DesignEmbedded Quantitative-Priority Mixed DesignEqual-weight concurrent embedded mixed methods designEqual-weight multilevel mixed methodsEqual-weight transformative mixed methods designEvaluation-focused case-focused mixed methodsEvaluation-oriented quantitative-priority mixed methods designMultiphase Mixed Methods DesignParticipatory Exploratory Sequential Mixed MethodsQualitative-dominant explanatory sequential mixed methodsQuantitative-dominant case-focused mixed methodsQuantitative-dominant concurrent embedded mixed methodsQuantitative-dominant explanatory sequential mixed methodsQuantitative-dominant multilevel mixed methodsQuantitative-dominant multiphase mixed methodsQuantitative-dominant pragmatic mixed methodsQuantitative-dominant transformative mixed methodsSequential Quantitative-Priority Mixed DesignSequential Transformative Mixed Methods

Similar methods

Embedded Multilevel Mixed MethodsEvaluation-oriented multilevel mixed methodsConcurrent Multilevel Mixed MethodsEqual-weight multilevel mixed methodsQualitative-dominant multilevel mixed methodsQuantitative-dominant multilevel mixed methodsParticipatory Multilevel Mixed MethodsDesign-based Multilevel Mixed Methods

Related reference concepts

Mixed-Methods Research in HealthcareMultilevel and Partial Pooling ModelsQualitative Research MethodsStudy Designs and Types of EvidenceResearch Methods and Study Designs in Health ServicesHierarchical Linear Modeling

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Multilevel Mixed Methods Design (Multilevel Mixed Methods Research Design). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/research-design/multilevel-mixed-methods-design · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Bonnie Nastasi, John Hitchcock, and collaborators; systematized by Creswell & Plano Clark
Year
Late 1990s–2000s
Type
Mixed methods research design
DataType
Both quantitative and qualitative data collected at multiple levels (e.g., individual, group, institutional)
Subfamily
Mixed methods design
Related methods
Concurrent Embedded Mixed Methods DesignConcurrent Triangulation Mixed Methods DesignExplanatory Sequential Mixed Methods DesignExploratory Sequential Mixed Methods DesignMultiphase Mixed Methods Design
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account