Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Pulmonology›St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire
Process / pipelinerespiratory-qol

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire

Also known as: SGRQ, St George's

The SGRQ is a 76-item disease-specific quality-of-life instrument designed to measure health status in patients with chronic respiratory disease, particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Developed by Jones and colleagues at King's College London in 1991, it has become the gold standard for assessing functional impact and symptom burden in respiratory populations. The SGRQ is widely used in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and routine respiratory care to track changes in patient-reported outcomes.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

SGRQ
ACQBCSCRQMRC DyspnoeaSNOT-22Nijmegen QuestionnaireRQLQ

When to use it

The SGRQ is indicated for patients with chronic respiratory conditions, particularly COPD, cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease, and asthma. It is preferred in clinical research, especially pharmacological or rehabilitative trials, where disease-specific outcomes are essential. The SGRQ can also monitor longitudinal disease progression in routine clinical practice. It is less suitable for acute respiratory conditions or patients unable to read/understand self-report items.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Disease-specific: Captures respiratory-relevant impacts on daily living, not generic health concepts
  • Psychometrically robust: Extensively validated, with established reliability (test–retest r>0.70), construct validity, and responsiveness to change
  • Sensitive to clinically meaningful change: MCID well-established (4 points), allowing precise detection of improvement or deterioration
  • Multicultural adaptations: Available in numerous languages with validated translations, facilitating international research and clinical use
Limitations
  • Length (76 items) may burden patients in routine clinical practice with limited time or cognitive fatigue
  • Requires literacy: Self-completion assumes adequate reading ability; no oral administration guidance provided
  • Ceiling/floor effects in some subgroups: Mild disease or near-remission patients may show limited score variance

Frequently asked

How long does the SGRQ take to complete?

Typically 10–15 minutes for most respondents. Patients with severe dyspnea or cognitive impairment may require additional time or assistance.

What score change indicates clinically meaningful improvement?

A reduction of ≥4 points on the 0–100 Total scale is considered the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). In group studies, a 4-point mean difference would signal a detectable treatment effect.

Is the SGRQ suitable for asthma-only patients, or is it COPD-specific?

While developed in COPD, the SGRQ has been validated in asthma, cystic fibrosis, and bronchiectasis. However, the emphasis on chronic activity limitation may be less sensitive in mild intermittent asthma; consider the Asthma Control Questionnaire for asthma-specific monitoring.

How do I score the SGRQ if a respondent skips items?

Item imputation procedures exist for missing data; typically, missing items in a subscale are estimated using the mean of completed items in that subscale. However, if >10% of items are missing, the questionnaire should be considered invalid.

Sources

  1. Jones, P. W., Quirk, F. H., & Baveystock, C. M. (1991). The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Respiratory Medicine, 85(Suppl B), 25-31. DOI: 10.1016/S0954-6111(06)80166-6 ↗
  2. Jones, P. W., Quirk, F. H., Baveystock, C. M., & Littlejohns, P. (1992). A self-complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation: The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 145(6), 1321-1327. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.6.1321 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/pulmonology/st-george-respiratory-questionnaire

Related methods

ACQBCSCRQMRC DyspnoeaSNOT-22

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • ACQPulmonology↔ compare
  • BCSPulmonology↔ compare
  • CRQPulmonology↔ compare
  • MRC DyspnoeaPulmonology↔ compare
  • SNOT-22Pulmonology↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

ACQBCSCRQMRC DyspnoeaNijmegen QuestionnaireRQLQSNOT-22

Similar methods

CRQACQCATMRC DyspnoeaBCSPAQLQACTNijmegen Questionnaire

Related reference concepts

Pulmonary Rehabilitation TechniquesObstructive Airway DiseasesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — SGRQ (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/pulmonology/st-george-respiratory-questionnaire · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Paul W. Jones, King's College London
Subfamily
respiratory-qol
Year
1991
Type
Self-report questionnaire
Related methods
ACQBCSCRQMRC DyspnoeaSNOT-22
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account