Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Psychiatry›Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES)
Process / pipelineDissociative symptom severity assessment

Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES)

Also known as: DES, DES-II (revised)

The DES is a 28-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure the frequency and severity of dissociative symptoms, including depersonalization (feeling detached from one's body), derealization (feeling the world is unreal), amnesia, absorption (intense focus), and identity confusion. Developed by Bernstein and Putnam in 1986, it is the most widely used dissociation screening instrument in clinical and research settings. The DES helps identify dissociative disorders (dissociative identity disorder, other specified dissociative disorder), trauma-related dissociation, and dissociative symptoms in other psychiatric conditions.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Dissociative Experiences Scale
Brief Psychiatric Rating…Positive and Negative Sy…Young Mania Rating ScaleBorderline Symptom ListEating Attitudes Test

When to use it

The DES is indicated as a screening tool when dissociative symptoms are suspected (patient reports memory gaps, feeling detached, experiencing 'lost time,' or reporting trauma). Use it at intake to identify dissociative symptomatology for diagnostic clarification. High DES scores (>20–30) should trigger further diagnostic assessment (SCID-D or structured dissociative disorder interview) to determine specific diagnosis. The DES is useful in psychiatric settings for patients with complex trauma histories, as comorbid dissociation is common in PTSD, depression, and anxiety. It is less useful as a sole diagnostic tool (diagnosis requires clinical interview and DSM-5 criteria) or in patients without suspected dissociation (routine screening in asymptomatic populations has low yield). The DES is appropriate for adolescents and adults; pediatric dissociation requires different measures.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Most widely used dissociation screening instrument with extensive research base (30+ years, 5000+ citations); norm data available for clinical and nonclinical samples.
  • Brief and non-invasive: 28 items, 10–15 minute completion, self-administered, no special training required to administer.
  • Captures breadth of dissociative phenomena: depersonalization, derealization, amnesia, absorption, identity confusion all sampled by items.
  • Sensitive to changes over time in response to treatment (trauma-focused psychotherapy, addressing underlying trauma); dissociative symptoms often improve as trauma processing progresses.
  • Appropriate for diverse populations (trauma survivors, psychiatric patients, forensic populations); translated into 20+ languages.
Limitations
  • Lacks specificity for dissociative disorder diagnosis; elevated DES (>20–30) can occur in PTSD, acute stress disorder, severe depression, and other conditions. DES screening is insufficient for diagnosis alone.
  • Does not distinguish quality or clinical significance of dissociation; a patient may endorse 'absorption' (normal, adaptive) and pathological 'lost time' (troubling, impairing) similarly.
  • Reliant on self-report of memory gaps; patients with amnestic gaps may under-report (they don't remember episodes, so can't rate frequency accurately). Collateral information from family/clinicians may be needed.
  • Lacks standardized subscale structure; various factor solutions proposed but not universally accepted, limiting subscale clinical utility.
  • Modest ceiling effects in severe dissociative disorder samples; score range 0–100 may cluster most severe cases at high end (80–100), reducing sensitivity to incremental improvement.

Frequently asked

What is the difference between normal absorption and pathological dissociation on the DES?

Normal absorption (e.g., 'losing track of time reading an engaging book') is adaptive, intentional, and easily interrupted; DES items capturing this are common in nonclinical samples. Pathological dissociation (e.g., 'finding evidence of actions with no memory, feeling emotionally disconnected despite awareness of events') is involuntary, distressing, and associated with impairment. DES scores >30 with predominance of pathological items (amnesia, identity confusion, depersonalization) suggest disorder; elevated absorption alone does not. Clinical interview clarifies item meaning and distress/impairment level.

If DES is elevated (>20), does the person definitely have a dissociative disorder?

No. DES >20 indicates clinically significant dissociation but does not diagnose a dissociative disorder. Elevated DES is also seen in PTSD (50–60% of PTSD patients), major depression with trauma, acute stress disorder, and substance abuse. Diagnosis of dissociative identity disorder or other dissociative disorder requires: (1) DES ≥30 (though not absolute), (2) structured diagnostic interview confirming dissociative symptoms meet DSM-5 criteria, (3) history of repeated trauma (usually in childhood for DID), (4) documented functional impairment, and (5) exclusion of substance/medical causes. DES is screening; diagnosis is clinical.

Can someone with a dissociative disorder score low on the DES?

Yes, particularly in individuals with amnestic dissociative presentations. Dissociative amnesia is common in DID but amnestic gaps mean the person doesn't remember episodes and cannot accurately rate frequency ('I don't remember, so I can't say 0–100%'). DES may underestimate amnestic dissociation. Collateral reports (family members documenting observed personality switches or behavioral episodes) are valuable when DES seems discrepant from clinical observation.

How quickly does DES improve with trauma treatment (EMDR, CPT)?

Dissociative symptoms often improve gradually over 8–16 weeks of trauma-focused psychotherapy, with typical reductions of 20–40% from baseline. Rapid improvement (weeks) is less common than with anxiety or depression; dissociation persists longer because it is a survival mechanism that doesn't extinguish quickly with threat processing. Patients with very high DES (>50) often require stabilization phase (weeks 1–8: grounding, affect regulation, safety) before trauma processing; active trauma work (weeks 8–16) typically reduces DES further. Monitor every 4 weeks; slow or no improvement suggests need for treatment adjustment.

Should I interpret DES differently for childhood trauma survivors versus those with recent single-incident trauma?

Yes. Childhood-onset, complex trauma (DID typical presentation) often shows very high DES (≥50), while single-incident recent trauma (acute stress disorder) shows moderate elevation (20–30). Chronic dissociation from prolonged early trauma is often more entrenched and slower to improve; acute dissociation post-trauma often resolves faster (weeks to months) with trauma processing. Clinical context (trauma onset age, duration, treatment phase) informs expectation for DES change trajectory.

Can substance use affect DES scores, and should I screen for substance use before interpreting DES?

Yes. Active substance intoxication or withdrawal can produce dissociation-like experiences (depersonalization, derealization), elevating DES spuriously. Screen for recent substance use and consider deferring formal DES assessment until patient is clear of acute intoxication. Long-term heavy use (especially stimulants or hallucinogens) can produce persistent dissociative symptoms; distinguish substance-induced dissociation from primary dissociative disorder by monitoring DES after sustained sobriety (30–90 days).

Sources

  1. Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174(12), 727–735. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004 ↗
  2. Putnam, F. W., Carlson, E. B., Ross, C. A., Torem, M., Shi, Y., Fielding, S., & Elterman, E. (1996). Patterns of dissociation in clinical and nonclinical samples. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 184(11), 673–679. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-199611000-00004 ↗
  3. Carlson, E. B., Putnam, F. W., Ross, C. A., Torem, M., Coons, P., Bowman, E. S., ... & Spiegel, D. (2011). Features and outcome of 34 patients with dissociative identity disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199(8), 632–645. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/psychiatry/dissociative-experiences-scale

Related methods

Brief Psychiatric Rating ScalePositive and Negative Syndrome ScaleYoung Mania Rating Scale

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Brief Psychiatric Rating ScalePsychiatry↔ compare
  • Positive and Negative Syndrome ScalePsychiatry↔ compare
  • Young Mania Rating ScalePsychiatry↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Borderline Symptom ListEating Attitudes TestYoung Mania Rating Scale

Similar methods

Cambridge Depersonalisation ScaleImpact of Event Scale RevisedDifficulties in Emotion Regulation ScalePeritraumatic Distress InventoryDSESPTSD Checklist for DSM-5Combat Exposure ScalePrimary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5

Related reference concepts

Diagnostic InterviewingAcute Stress DisorderDepression and Anxiety ScreeningMental Health and Substance Use ScreeningPost-Traumatic Stress DisorderDepression and Anxiety Disorder Screening

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Dissociative Experiences Scale (Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/psychiatry/dissociative-experiences-scale · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Frank W. Putnam
Subfamily
Dissociative symptom severity assessment
Year
1986
Type
Self-report questionnaire
Related methods
Brief Psychiatric Rating ScalePositive and Negative Syndrome ScaleYoung Mania Rating Scale
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account