Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Also known as: DERS, DERS-36
The DERS is a 36-item self-report measure assessing multidimensional emotion dysregulation across six related but distinct facets. Developed by Gratz and Roemer in 2004, it has become a cornerstone transdiagnostic measure in emotion regulation research, capturing emotional avoidance, behavioral dyscontrol, and limited coping awareness that cut across psychiatric conditions.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
Primary use: transdiagnostic assessment of emotion dysregulation severity and profile across clinical populations including anxiety disorders, depression, substance use, eating disorders, personality disorders, and PTSD. Baseline and outcome measurement in emotion regulation-focused interventions (dialectical behavior therapy, acceptance-commitment therapy, emotion regulation therapy). Identification of specific emotion dysregulation facets to target in treatment. Not designed as diagnostic instrument but provides dimensional measurement of core psychopathology feature common across disorders.
Strengths & limitations
- Multidimensional capture: six-factor model identifies specific regulation deficits beyond single dysregulation score, enabling targeted intervention
- Strong empirical validation: factor structure confirmed in multiple independent samples; excellent internal consistency (subscales α=0.73–0.92, total α=0.93)
- Transdiagnostic relevance: emotion dysregulation is core feature across anxiety, mood, personality, and substance use disorders; DERS captures this transdiagnostic construct
- Clinical utility: strong associations with psychopathology severity, self-harm, and treatment outcome; subscale profiles inform treatment selection
- Sensitive to change: responsive to emotion regulation-focused interventions; useful for outcome tracking in clinical settings
- Moderate scale lengths: 36 items requires 10–15 minutes; shorter forms (DERS-16) available but sacrifice information
- Reverse-scoring burden: 18 reverse-scored items increase administration error risk; careful attention required
- Limited developmental data: psychometric properties not thoroughly established in adolescents <16; limited data on children
- Overlap between subscales: Correlations among subscales moderate to high (r=0.49–0.73), suggesting possible hierarchical structure; independence assumption may not fully hold
- State/trait confusion: DERS measures typical difficulties but cannot distinguish acute crisis regulation from chronic difficulties; contextual factors important
Frequently asked
What is the appropriate cutoff score for clinical significance?
A total DERS score ≥104 indicates significant emotion dysregulation with 88% sensitivity and 85% specificity for distinguishing clinical from non-clinical samples. However, clinical cutoff may vary by disorder; depressed samples average ~107, substance use ~110, borderline personality disorder ~120. Interpret in context of presenting symptoms and severity.
Should I use the 36-item DERS or the shorter 16-item version (DERS-16)?
The full 36-item DERS provides six subscale scores with greater specificity for treatment planning. DERS-16 is brief screening tool but sacrifices subscale information. In clinical settings prioritizing detailed assessment, use DERS-36. In research requiring efficiency or multiple measures, DERS-16 is acceptable alternative.
Why are 18 items reverse-scored? Does this indicate problematic scale design?
Reverse-scoring addresses response bias by varying item direction. It is standard practice in multi-item scales and does not indicate design problems. However, it increases administration errors; carefully verify reverse-scoring during scoring. Computer-based or automated scoring reduces error risk.
Can DERS subscales be used independently or must all six be measured?
All six subscales can be reliably measured and interpreted independently. Clinicians can focus on specific subscales (e.g., Impulse control in substance use, Awareness in alexithymia) if research questions warrant. However, total DERS score captures overall dysregulation and provides context for subscale interpretation.
Is DERS available free for clinical and research use?
Yes. The DERS is freely available in the public domain. The 36-item version and DERS-16 short form can be reproduced without permission for non-commercial research and clinical use. Cite Gratz & Roemer (2004) original publication. Scoring templates and manuals are available through the authors.
Sources
- Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. DOI: 10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/clinical-psychology/difficulties-emotion-regulation
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Adult ADHD Self-Report ScaleClinical Psychology↔ compare
- Affective Lability ScaleClinical Psychology↔ compare
- Emotion Dysregulation ScaleClinical Psychology↔ compare
- Emotion Regulation QuestionnaireClinical Psychology↔ compare