Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Organizational Behavior›Toxic Leadership Scale
Process / pipelineLeadership style

Toxic Leadership Scale

Toxic Leadership Scale (TLS) · Also known as: Destructive Leadership Scale

The Toxic Leadership Scale (TLS) is a 16-item instrument measuring destructive leadership behaviors including abusive supervision, narcissism, and authoritarian control. Developed by Einarsen, Aasland, and Skogstad in 2007, the TLS identifies harmful leadership behaviors that undermine organizational effectiveness and employee well-being.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Toxic Leadership Scale
Authentic Leadership Sca…Employee Engagement Surv…Ethical Leadership ScaleOrganizational Trust Sca…

When to use it

The TLS is valuable in leadership effectiveness evaluation, human resources investigation, executive coaching needs assessment, and organizational health monitoring. Use it to identify toxic leaders, investigate culture concerns, determine coaching interventions, assess leadership fit, and monitor leadership behavior change following feedback or intervention.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Identifies destructive leader behaviors often overlooked in positive leadership measures that assess only what leaders do well
  • Grounded in organizational stress theory and empirically linked to negative outcomes including burnout, turnover, and psychological distress
  • Multi-source assessment capability (self, subordinate, peer, observer) enables triangulation and verification of concerning behaviors
  • Actionable measure enabling specific behavioral feedback and coaching
Limitations
  • Self-report validity questionable; toxic leaders often lack insight into their impact, significantly underestimating scores versus subordinate ratings
  • Subject to supervisor retaliation concerns when subordinates provide honest feedback; anonymous administration essential but not always feasible
  • Does not assess competence or organizational contribution; toxic leaders may demonstrate high technical ability despite damaging behaviors
  • Single point-in-time measurement captures behavior snapshot only; destructive behavior may vary situationally or over time

Frequently asked

Can toxic leaders change their behavior through coaching?

Limited evidence supports behavior change without intense intervention. Some toxic behaviors reflect personality traits (narcissism, authoritarianism) resistant to coaching. Others may respond to feedback if leaders have self-awareness and genuine motivation to change. Coaching success depends on leader accountability and consequence structure from organizational leadership.

Should toxic leaders be removed from organizations immediately?

Organizations balance competing interests: immediate removal protects employee welfare and prevents further damage; measured approach with feedback, coaching, and monitoring provides development opportunity while protecting subordinates. Decision depends on toxicity severity, leader amenability to change, and organizational risk tolerance for staying the course.

How common is toxic leadership in organizations?

Research suggests 10–15% of leaders demonstrate significantly toxic patterns affecting employee well-being. However, toxic behaviors exist on a continuum; many leaders exhibit occasional toxic behaviors without reaching pathological levels. Regular TLS assessment helps organizations identify toxic patterns before they become entrenched.

Sources

  1. Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 207-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.002 ↗
  2. Shaw, J. B., Erickson, A., & Harvey, M. (2011). A method for measuring destructive leadership and identifying types of destructive leaders in organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 575-590. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.001 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Toxic Leadership Scale (TLS). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/organizational-behavior/toxic-leadership-scale

Related methods

Authentic Leadership ScaleEmployee Engagement SurveyEthical Leadership ScaleOrganizational Trust Scale

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Authentic Leadership ScaleOrganizational Behavior↔ compare
  • Employee Engagement SurveyOrganizational Behavior↔ compare
  • Ethical Leadership ScaleOrganizational Behavior↔ compare
  • Organizational Trust ScaleOrganizational Behavior↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Authentic Leadership ScaleEthical Leadership Scale

Similar methods

Ethical Leadership ScaleTransformational Leadership ScaleAbusive Supervision ScaleAuthentic Leadership ScaleNegative Acts QuestionnaireServant Leadership ScaleOrganizational Trust ScaleLeader-Member Exchange Scale

Related reference concepts

Personality Scales & InventoriesManagement & Management TrainingOccupational & Employment TestingPersonnel Evaluation & Job PerformanceOrganizational BehaviorDevelopmental Scales & Schedules

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Toxic Leadership Scale (Toxic Leadership Scale (TLS)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/organizational-behavior/toxic-leadership-scale · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Einarsen, Aasland, and Skogstad
Subfamily
Leadership style
Year
2007
Type
Observational scale
Related methods
Authentic Leadership ScaleEmployee Engagement SurveyEthical Leadership ScaleOrganizational Trust Scale
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account