Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Neuropsychology›Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire
Process / pipelinememory assessment self-report

Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire

Also known as: PRMQ, Prospective Retrospective Memory Questionnaire

The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) is a 16-item self-report instrument designed to measure subjective memory complaints across two distinct memory domains: prospective memory (remembering to do things in the future) and retrospective memory (remembering past events and information). Developed by Crawford and colleagues at the University of Edinburgh in 2003, the PRMQ provides a brief, validated tool for assessing everyday memory lapses and their impact on functional well-being in both clinical and non-clinical populations.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire
Alzheimer's Disease Asse…Cognitive Failures Quest…Frontal Assessment Batte…Mini-Mental State Examin…Trail Making Test

When to use it

The PRMQ is appropriate for assessing subjective memory complaints in primary care, geriatric clinics, neuropsychology, occupational health, and research contexts. It is useful for understanding patients' functional concerns and the impact of memory on daily activities. The PRMQ can help clinicians decide whether formal neuropsychological testing is warranted and can track subjective memory-related distress over time. However, the PRMQ is not diagnostic for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or other memory disorders and should be integrated with objective testing and clinical judgment.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Distinct measurement of prospective and retrospective memory — separates two fundamental memory types, providing more nuanced assessment than instruments measuring only retrospective memory.
  • Brief and self-administered — takes 5–10 minutes; no clinician training required; can be completed in clinical settings or remotely.
  • Strong psychometric properties — good internal consistency (α ≈ 0.80), test–retest reliability (r ≈ 0.75–0.80), and validity across age groups and clinical populations.
  • Captures functional impact — emphasizes everyday memory experience relevant to daily activities (remembering appointments, forgetting conversations).
Limitations
  • Weak correlation with objective memory tests — high PRMQ scores do not necessarily indicate cognitive impairment; the instrument measures subjective complaint burden rather than objective memory ability.
  • Vulnerable to mood and situational factors — depression, anxiety, stress, fatigue, and life changes substantially inflate PRMQ scores independent of true memory ability.
  • Not diagnostic — the PRMQ does not diagnose dementia or memory disorders; it is a screening or descriptive tool only.
  • Limited longitudinal data — fewer published studies examining PRMQ change as a predictor of cognitive decline or dementia conversion compared to instruments like the MMSE.

Frequently asked

What is the difference between prospective and retrospective memory in the PRMQ?

Prospective memory (PRMQ subscale 1) involves remembering to do things in the future (remembering an appointment, taking medication). Retrospective memory (PRMQ subscale 2) involves recalling past information (names, conversations, where you put things). Both are assessed separately on the PRMQ, allowing clinicians to identify which type of memory is more problematic.

If a patient scores high on the PRMQ but has normal objective memory tests, what does that mean?

Discordance between subjective complaints (PRMQ) and objective test performance is common and often reflects mood (depression, anxiety), stress, sleep deprivation, or attentional fatigue rather than true memory impairment. However, some patients with early cognitive decline report high subjective complaints before objective deficits emerge. Assessment of mood and stress is essential; if concern persists, repeat testing in 6–12 months.

Can the PRMQ be used to diagnose mild cognitive impairment or dementia?

No. The PRMQ is a subjective complaint instrument and cannot diagnose cognitive disorders. Diagnosis requires comprehensive cognitive assessment, clinical evaluation, imaging, biomarkers, and functional assessment. However, PRMQ can be a component of a broader cognitive workup.

What PRMQ score should prompt referral for formal neuropsychology?

There is no absolute cutoff. A PRMQ score of 40+ is elevated relative to normative data and may warrant consideration of formal testing, especially if accompanied by functional decline or concern on clinical interview. Always integrate PRMQ with clinical judgment, mood assessment, and functional history.

Sources

  1. Crawford, J. R., Smith, G., Maylor, E. A., Della Sala, S., & Logie, R. H. (2003). The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Memory, 11(3), 261-275. DOI: 10.1080/09658210244000027 ↗
  2. Smith, G., Della Sala, S., Logie, R. H., & Maylor, E. A. (2000). Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: A questionnaire study. Memory, 8(5), 311-321. DOI: 10.1080/09658210050117735 ↗
  3. Kliegel, M., Ramuschkat, G., & Martin, M. (2010). Complex prospective memory in younger and older adults: Does the delay of the intended action make a difference? International Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 210-217. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/neuropsychology/prospective-retrospective-memory

Related methods

Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-CognitiveCognitive Failures QuestionnaireFrontal Assessment BatteryMini-Mental State ExaminationTrail Making Test

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-CognitiveNeuropsychology↔ compare
  • Cognitive Failures QuestionnaireNeuropsychology↔ compare
  • Frontal Assessment BatteryNeuropsychology↔ compare
  • Mini-Mental State ExaminationNeuropsychology↔ compare
  • Trail Making TestNeuropsychology↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Cognitive Failures Questionnaire

Similar methods

Cognitive Failures QuestionnaireMini-Mental State ExaminationSaint Louis University Mental Status ExaminationTICSDEMQOL Dementia Quality of Life MeasureMattis Dementia Rating ScaleMontreal Cognitive AssessmentNeuropsychological Assessment

Related reference concepts

Cognitive AssessmentMild Cognitive ImpairmentCognitive Assessment and Mental StatusNeuropsychological AssessmentCognitive and Neuropsychological AssessmentAlzheimer Disease in Older Adults

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/neuropsychology/prospective-retrospective-memory · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
John Crawford
Subfamily
memory assessment self-report
Year
2003
Type
Self-report questionnaire of prospective and retrospective memory complaints
Related methods
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-CognitiveCognitive Failures QuestionnaireFrontal Assessment BatteryMini-Mental State ExaminationTrail Making Test
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account