Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Mining Engineering›Shrinking Core Model
Process / pipelineHydrometallurgical Kinetics

Shrinking Core Model

Shrinking Core Model for Leaching and Roasting · Also known as: Shrinking Unreacted Core Model, SCM, Leaching Kinetics Model

The Shrinking Core Model, formalized by Szekely, Evans, and Sohn in 1976, describes the kinetics of chemical reactions between solid ore particles and surrounding fluids (leaching solutions, roasting gases). As the reaction proceeds from the particle surface inward, an unreacted core shrinks while products accumulate in a product layer. The model enables prediction of leaching times and optimization of hydrometallurgical processes.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Shrinking Core Model
ElectrowinningEllingham DiagramSlag BasicityBond Work Index

When to use it

Use the Shrinking Core Model when designing hydrometallurgical processes where ore particles react with leaching solutions (acid leaching, heap leaching, bioleaching) or roasting with gases. Assume spherical particles and well-mixed, isothermal bulk fluid. Works best for single ore minerals or simple ore assemblies. For complex multicomponent ores or non-spherical particles, use numerical simulations.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Simple analytical model with physically interpretable rate parameters
  • Identifies limiting steps, guiding process optimization
  • Robust: predicts conversion-time relationships across wide ranges of temperature and concentration
  • Easy to fit to laboratory data and scale to industrial operations
  • Widely used in hydrometallurgy and pyrometallurgy; abundant reference literature
Limitations
  • Assumes spherical particles; non-spherical ore breaks assumption
  • Model does not account for cracking or fragmentation of the product layer, which accelerates reaction in real systems
  • Product layer is assumed solid and impermeable; some products are permeable or dissolve, invalidating assumption
  • Bulk concentration of reactant is assumed constant; in closed systems or batch leaching, concentration drops significantly
  • Assumes no interactions between particles; in dense slurries, particle-particle effects (osmotic pressure, concentration gradients) matter

Frequently asked

How do I know which limiting step (diffusion vs. reaction) applies to my leaching process?

Plot the linearized data. For diffusion control: plot [1 - 3(1-X)^(2/3) + 2(1-X)] versus time—should be linear. For reaction control: plot 1-(1-X)^(1/3) versus time—should be linear. If neither is perfect, your process may have mixed control or involve other steps.

What is a typical effective diffusivity (D_e) for ion diffusion in ore particle layers?

Typical values range 10^-6 to 10^-8 cm²/s at room temperature, decreasing with temperature. Real measured values depend on pore geometry, tortuosity, and fluid properties. Measure or look up literature values for your specific ore type.

How do I apply shrinking core to non-spherical ore particles?

The model assumes spheres. For other shapes, use shape factors or numerically solve the diffusion equation. Alternatively, measure the relationship between time and mean particle size empirically and ignore the analytical solution.

If my ore fragments during leaching, does the shrinking core model break?

Yes, fragmentation introduces new surface area and breaks the constant-size assumption. Empirically, apply corrections: adjust the model to account for surface area increase (multiply rate by fragmentation factor >1). Fragmentation factors are ore-specific and best determined experimentally.

Can I use shrinking core for heap leaching where particle sizes are not uniform?

Use population balance models that track the shrinking core model for each size class. Average the results over the size distribution. This is more complex but captures reality. Alternatively, apply the shrinking core model to the average particle size as a rough estimate.

Sources

  1. Szekely, J., Evans, J. W., & Sohn, H. Y. (1976). Gas-solid reactions. Academic Press, New York. link ↗
  2. Levenspiel, O. (1999). Chemical reaction engineering (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1021/ie990488g ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Shrinking Core Model for Leaching and Roasting. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/mining-engineering/shrinking-core-model

Related methods

ElectrowinningEllingham DiagramSlag Basicity

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • ElectrowinningMining Engineering↔ compare
  • Ellingham DiagramMining Engineering↔ compare
  • Slag BasicityMining Engineering↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Bond Work IndexElectrowinningEllingham DiagramSlag Basicity

Similar methods

Flotation KineticsElectrowinningSlag BasicityCSTR ModelEllingham DiagramAdsorption Isotherm (Langmuir-Freundlich)Fick's LawsPFR Model

Related reference concepts

Mass Transport and Diffusion in ElectrochemistryCorrosion and ElectrodepositionButler–Volmer KineticsElectrode KineticsExchange Current and OverpotentialContaminant Transport in Groundwater

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Shrinking Core Model (Shrinking Core Model for Leaching and Roasting). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/mining-engineering/shrinking-core-model · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Szekely, Evans, and Sohn
Subfamily
Hydrometallurgical Kinetics
Year
1976
Type
Reaction kinetics model for solid-fluid reactions
Related methods
ElectrowinningEllingham DiagramSlag Basicity
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account