Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Integrative Medicine›Attitudes toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine Scale
Process / pipelineAttitudes and beliefs toward CAM

Attitudes toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine Scale

Also known as: ACAMS

The ACAMS is a self-report instrument measuring healthcare professionals' and students' attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine. Developed in the early 2000s, it assesses openness, acceptance, and perceived legitimacy of CAM alongside conventional medicine, helping identify educational gaps and organizational readiness for integrative practice.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Attitudes toward CAM Scale
CAM Use QuestionnaireHolistic Caring InventoryIntegrative Medicine Att…Spiritual Care Competenc…Music Therapy Assessment…Nature Relatedness ScalePatient Satisfaction wit…Therapeutic Touch Assess…

When to use it

The ACAMS is designed for healthcare professionals and students to measure their baseline attitudes toward CAM. Use it to assess readiness for integrative medicine training, identify subgroups (by discipline, seniority, or background) with differing attitudes, evaluate the impact of CAM education or exposure on attitudes, and predict receptiveness to new clinical guidelines incorporating CAM.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Directly measures professional attitudes, a key determinant of CAM integration and patient counseling.
  • Suitable for diverse healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists).
  • Brief administration time (5–10 minutes) facilitates use in large surveys and educational settings.
  • Captures multidimensional attitudes (effectiveness, safety, legitimacy) rather than simple acceptance/rejection.
Limitations
  • Social desirability bias: respondents may overstate openness to CAM to appear progressive or holistic.
  • Stability over time unclear: attitudes may fluctuate with media coverage, clinical experience, or organizational culture; reliability across years not well-established.
  • Evidence-base gaps: items do not always distinguish between CAM modalities with varying levels of evidence (e.g., acupuncture vs. homeopathy).
  • Norm-referencing: interpretation relies on comparison to reference groups; individual cutoff scores for clinical decision-making are not established.

Frequently asked

Should I use ACAMS if I want to measure knowledge about CAM rather than attitudes?

No. ACAMS measures attitudes (beliefs, openness, acceptance), not knowledge or understanding. For knowledge assessment, use a CAM knowledge test or clinical competency scale.

How do ACAMS scores differ between physicians and nurses?

Studies typically show nurses report higher openness to CAM than physicians, likely reflecting different educational traditions and professional cultures. Always report scores stratified by discipline and use discipline-specific norms if available.

Can ACAMS be used to predict whether a clinician will recommend CAM to patients?

Attitudes are one predictor of behavior, but not deterministic. High attitude scores are associated with greater willingness to recommend CAM, but knowledge, clinical guidelines, patient factors, and organizational culture also influence actual referral patterns.

How do I interpret a mid-range ACAMS score?

Mid-range scores typically reflect mixed or cautious attitudes—the respondent sees potential value in some CAM modalities under certain conditions but may have concerns about evidence, safety, or professional legitimacy. Use qualitative follow-up or open-ended items to clarify which specific modalities or concerns drive the score.

Sources

  1. Hough, H. J., Darcey, V. L., & Scofield, R. F. (2003). Attitudes toward alternative/complementary medicines among pharmacy students, faculty, and preceptors. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 67(3), 85. link ↗
  2. Chan, M. F., Chan, E. A., & Mok, E. (2002). Attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine: A cross-sectional study of Hong Kong nursing students. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 11(5), 597–605. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Attitudes toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/integrative-medicine/attitudes-cam-scale

Related methods

CAM Use QuestionnaireHolistic Caring InventoryIntegrative Medicine Attitude QuestionnaireSpiritual Care Competence Scale

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • CAM Use QuestionnaireIntegrative Medicine↔ compare
  • Holistic Caring InventoryIntegrative Medicine↔ compare
  • Integrative Medicine Attitude QuestionnaireIntegrative Medicine↔ compare
  • Spiritual Care Competence ScaleIntegrative Medicine↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

CAM Use QuestionnaireHolistic Caring InventoryIntegrative Medicine Attitude QuestionnaireMusic Therapy Assessment ToolNature Relatedness ScalePatient Satisfaction with CAM ScaleSpiritual Care Competence ScaleTherapeutic Touch Assessment Scale

Similar methods

Integrative Medicine Attitude QuestionnaireCAM Use QuestionnairePatient Satisfaction with CAM ScaleCultural Humility ScaleTherapeutic Touch Assessment ScaleHolistic Caring InventoryCognitive and Affective Mindfulness ScaleCross-Cultural Competence Inventory

Related reference concepts

Attitude MeasuresConsumer Opinion & Attitude TestingCultural Competence in CareHealth Literacy AssessmentCompliance Strategies and Behavior ChangeProfessional Personnel Attitudes & Characteristics

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Attitudes toward CAM Scale (Attitudes toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine Scale). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/integrative-medicine/attitudes-cam-scale · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Hough, H. J.; Darcey, V. L.; Scofield, R. F.
Subfamily
Attitudes and beliefs toward CAM
Year
2003
Type
Self-report scale
Related methods
CAM Use QuestionnaireHolistic Caring InventoryIntegrative Medicine Attitude QuestionnaireSpiritual Care Competence Scale
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account