Process / pipelineDeneysel desen
Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial — Real-World Experimental Evidence
A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pRCT) tests whether an intervention works under ordinary, real-world conditions — broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and routine care settings. Participants are still randomly assigned to treatment or control, preserving causal inference, but the study is designed to reflect the diversity and variability of actual practice rather than the ideal conditions of an explanatory trial. The defining framework is the PRECIS-2 tool, which maps any RCT along nine pragmatic-to-explanatory dimensions.
Find Topic with PaperMindSoonVideoSoon
Read the full method
Members only
Sign inSign in with a free account to read this section.
Sources
- Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0 ↗
- Thorpe, K. E., Zwarenstein, M., Oxman, A. D., Treweek, S., Furberg, C. D., Altman, D. G., … Chalkidou, K. (2009). A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(5), 464–475. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.011 ↗
Related methods
Referenced by
Pragmatic ABA DesignPragmatic control group experimental designPragmatic Field ExperimentPragmatic Full Factorial ExperimentPragmatic Multi-Arm ExperimentPragmatic pretest-posttest experimental designPragmatic Single-Subject Experimental DesignPragmatic Solomon Four-Group DesignSingle-blind Randomized Controlled Trial