Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Experimental design›Plackett-Burman Screening Design
Hypothesis test

Plackett-Burman Screening Design

Also known as: PB design, PB screening, Plackett-Burman Tarama Deseni

The Plackett-Burman design is a two-level orthogonal screening design introduced by R.L. Plackett and J.P. Burman in 1946 that allows researchers to estimate the main effect of each factor independently using the smallest possible number of experimental runs. Run counts are always multiples of four, making it exceptionally economical for studies with many candidate factors.

ScholarGate
  1. Hypothesis test
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Plackett-Burman Design
Central Composite DesignFractional Factorial Des…One-way ANOVAResponse Surface Methodo…Optimal Experimental Des…

When to use it

Use a Plackett-Burman design when you need to screen a large number of factors — typically five or more — and you want to identify the few that are truly influential while using the minimum number of experimental runs. Three conditions should hold: the response is approximately normally distributed for a given set of conditions, two-factor and higher-order interactions can be assumed negligible relative to main effects at this early screening stage, and the factors can each be set reliably at two discrete levels. If strong interactions are suspected, a full or fractional factorial design is more appropriate. After screening, significant factors should be studied further with a response-surface methodology such as the central composite design.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Highly economical: N runs screen up to N−1 factors, so a 12-run design handles up to 11 factors.
  • Fully orthogonal main-effect estimates mean no collinearity and no ambiguity in attributing effects.
  • Run counts scale in multiples of four, giving flexibility to match practical experimental constraints.
  • Backed by the original 1946 paper and decades of application in pharmaceutical, chemical, and manufacturing research.
Limitations
  • Main effects are partially aliased with two-factor interactions in non-regular Plackett-Burman designs, so interactions cannot be estimated or cleanly separated.
  • The design supports main-effect screening only; curvature and interaction modelling require a follow-up design.
  • With very few runs, the residual degrees of freedom can be small, reducing the power to detect modest effects.
  • Factors must be controllable at exactly two levels, ruling out naturally continuous or ordered multi-level factors without discretisation.

Frequently asked

How many factors can a 12-run Plackett-Burman design screen?

A 12-run Plackett-Burman design can screen up to 11 factors. In general, a design with N runs screens up to N−1 factors, because one degree of freedom is used for the overall mean. Common sizes are 8-run (7 factors), 12-run (11 factors), 16-run (15 factors), and 20-run (19 factors).

Why can't two-factor interactions be estimated?

In non-regular Plackett-Burman designs, every main effect is partially aliased with every two-factor interaction — no pair of columns is completely independent of any cross-product column. This 'complex aliasing' means that if a large interaction exists, the estimate for the corresponding main effect will be biased. For this reason, the design is appropriate only when interactions can be assumed small at the screening stage.

What should I do after identifying the important factors?

Plackett-Burman screening is explicitly the first phase of a two-phase strategy. Once you know which two to five factors are active, run a follow-up experiment — such as a central composite design or Box-Behnken design — to model curvature and interactions among those important factors and find the optimal operating conditions.

Is the Plackett-Burman design the same as a fractional factorial?

They are related but different. Fractional factorials are subsets of full 2^k factorials and produce regular designs with clearly defined aliasing patterns. Plackett-Burman designs include non-regular designs (e.g. the 12-run design) where aliasing is more complex and spread across many terms. When N is a power of 2, the Plackett-Burman design coincides with a resolution-III fractional factorial.

Sources

  1. Plackett, R.L. & Burman, J.P. (1946). The Design of Optimum Multifactorial Experiments. Biometrika, 33(4), 305–325. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/33.4.305 ↗
  2. Montgomery, D.C. (2017). Design and Analysis of Experiments (9th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1119492443

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Plackett-Burman Screening Design. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/experimental-design/plackett-burman

Related methods

Central Composite DesignFractional Factorial DesignOne-way ANOVAResponse Surface Methodology

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Central Composite DesignExperimental design↔ compare
  • Fractional Factorial DesignExperimental design↔ compare
  • One-way ANOVAStatistics↔ compare
  • Response Surface MethodologyExperimental design↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Optimal Experimental Design

Similar methods

Fractional Factorial ExperimentFractional Factorial DesignDesign of experimentsSensitivity Analysis with Fractional Factorial DesignPilot full factorial experimentFull Factorial DesignFull Factorial ExperimentAdaptive Fractional Factorial Experiment

Related reference concepts

Partial Least Squares RegressionQuality by Design (QbD) and Process UnderstandingMultivariate RegressionFactor AnalysisHigh-Throughput Screening MethodsSample Size Calculation

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Plackett-Burman Design (Plackett-Burman Screening Design). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/experimental-design/plackett-burman · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
R.L. Plackett & J.P. Burman
Year
1946
Family
Screening design
Type
Two-level orthogonal array
Levels
2
RunMultiple
multiples of 4
Parametric
Yes
Aliasing
main effects partially aliased with two-factor interactions
MinRuns
8
Purpose
factor screening
Related methods
Central Composite DesignFractional Factorial DesignOne-way ANOVAResponse Surface Methodology
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account