Spatial Inverse Probability Weighting
Spatial Inverse Probability Weighting extends the classical IPW estimator to settings where units are geo-referenced and spatial location is a confounding dimension. By incorporating geographic coordinates or spatial proximity into the propensity score model, it reweights the observed sample so that treatment and control groups are balanced not only on measured covariates but also on spatial structure, enabling credible causal inference from spatially indexed observational data.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. · DOI 10.1111/1468-0262.00442
- Papadogeorgou, G., Choirat, C., & Zigler, C. M. (2019). Adjusting for unmeasured spatial confounding with distance adjusted propensity score matching. Biostatistics, 20(2), 256-272. · DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx074
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.