Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Jonckheere-Terpstra Test/Evidence
Method evidence record

Jonckheere-Terpstra Test

The Jonckheere-Terpstra test is a nonparametric hypothesis test that detects a monotone trend across k ordered groups — testing whether the outcome rises (or falls) systematically as the group order increases. Developed independently by T. J. Terpstra (1952) and A. R. Jonckheere (1954), it is the directional, ordered-alternative counterpart to the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Jonckheere-Terpstra Test for Ordered Alternatives
Taxonomic method record · hypothesis-test / statistics
  • Jonckheere, A. R. (1954). A distribution-free k-sample test against ordered alternatives. Biometrika, 41(1-2), 133–145. · DOI 10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.133
  • Terpstra, T. J. (1952). The asymptotic normality and consistency of Kendall's test against trend, when ties are present in one ranking. Indagationes Mathematicae, 14, 327–333. · URL
  • Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2014). Nonparametric Statistical Methods (3rd ed.). Wiley. · ISBN 978-0470387375
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyFriedman testmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyKruskal-Wallis testmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMann-Whitney U testmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyOne-way ANOVAmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySpearman Correlationmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account