Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Nijmegen Questionnaire/Evidence
Method evidence record

Nijmegen Questionnaire

The Nijmegen Questionnaire is a 16-item self-report instrument designed to identify dysfunctional breathing patterns, particularly hyperventilation syndrome, in patients presenting with respiratory or non-respiratory symptoms. Developed by van Beveren and colleagues in the Netherlands in 1994, it provides rapid assessment of symptoms attributable to chronic hyperventilation: dizziness, chest tightness, muscle tension, paresthesias, and anxiety. The Nijmegen Questionnaire is widely used in respiratory physiology clinics, pulmonary rehabilitation programs, and psychosomatic medicine to detect dysfunctional breathing phenotypes that may masquerade as asthma, anxiety disorders, or cardiopulmonary disease.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Nijmegen Questionnaire for Dysfunctional Breathing
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / pulmonology
  • Van Beveren, T. L., Fülöp, M., van Beek, H. G., & Zijlstra, F. J. (1994). Hyperventilation and panic panic attacks in a group of asthma patients. Respiration, 61(5), 282-287. · URL
  • Higgs, F., Donovan, G., Opdam, H., & Tiller, J. (2013). Hyperventilation and dysfunctional breathing: a tool for assessment and retraining. Breathe, 9(4), 284-293. · URL
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyACQmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyBCSmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCRQmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMRC Dyspnoeamachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySGRQmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account