Process / pipelineAccelerated Evidence Synthesis

Rapid Review Methodology

A rapid review is a systematic synthesis method that accelerates the evidence review process by streamlining or omitting certain systematic review steps while maintaining transparent, reproducible methodology. Pioneered by Khangura et al. (2012) and codified by the Cochrane Collaboration (2020), rapid reviews answer urgent policy or clinical questions in weeks to months rather than 12-18 months required by full systematic reviews. Methodological shortcuts—such as single screening of borderline studies, abbreviated search strategies, or limiting study designs—trades some rigor for speed. Rapid reviews are increasingly vital in responding to public health emergencies (pandemics, environmental crises) and evolving clinical practice questions where waiting for a full systematic review is not feasible.

Find Topic with PaperMindSoonVideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Sources

  1. Garritty, C., Gartlehner, G., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., et al. (2021). Cochrane Rapid Reviews interim guidance on methodological considerations for expedited reviews of interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 130, 13–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.006
  2. Tricco, A. C., Antony, J., Zarin, W., et al. (2015). A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Medicine, 13, 224. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6
  3. Khangura, S., Konnyu, K., Cushman, R., Grimshaw, J., & Moher, D. (2012). Evidence summaries: The evolution of a rapid review approach. Systematic Reviews, 1, 10. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10

Related methods

Referenced by

ScholarGateRapid Review Methodology (Rapid Review (Accelerated Systematic Review)). Retrieved 2026-06-04 from https://scholargate.app/en/evidence-synthesis/rapid-review-methodology