Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Ecology›eDNA Metabarcoding
Process / pipelineMolecular ecology

eDNA Metabarcoding

Environmental DNA Metabarcoding · Also known as: eDNA, metabarcoding, DNA metabarcoding, genetic monitoring

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding detects and identifies species present in environmental samples (water, soil, air) by sequencing short DNA fragments released by organisms. Developed by Taberlet and colleagues (2012), this approach has revolutionized biodiversity monitoring: species can be surveyed without capture, observation, or complex sampling designs. Metabarcoding sequences millions of DNA fragments, identifies reads taxonomically, and assigns them to species. The method is non-invasive, rapid, and cost-effective, enabling large-scale biodiversity surveys and early detection of cryptic or rare species.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

eDNA Metabarcoding
Bioaccumulation ModelDistance SamplingFunctional DiversitySpecies Accumulation

When to use it

Use eDNA metabarcoding for non-invasive biodiversity surveys, early detection of invasive or rare species, assessment of community change, or monitoring of microhabitats. Ideal for cryptic, small, or aquatic species difficult to survey directly. Requires well-curated reference sequences for accurate taxonomic assignment.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Non-invasive and non-lethal: no capture or killing of organisms required
  • Detects rare, cryptic, or early-life-stage organisms: any species that sheds DNA in the sample
  • Rapid and cost-effective compared to traditional surveys, enabling large-scale sampling
  • Unbiased in principle: detection does not depend on observer or sampling technique skill
  • Can quantify relative abundance (if standardized carefully) or presence-absence
Limitations
  • Taxonomic accuracy depends on reference database quality; unsequenced species cannot be identified
  • Does not provide spatial or behavioral information; eDNA does not reveal where organisms are or what they are doing
  • Environmental DNA degrades rapidly; detection time window is limited (days to weeks for most organisms)
  • Cannot distinguish live from dead organisms or viable from non-viable propagules; nucleic acids persist after death
  • Quantification is difficult and relative (reads) rather than absolute (individuals or biomass)

Frequently asked

How long does eDNA persist in the environment?

This depends on environmental conditions. In water, eDNA typically persists for days to weeks; temperature, pH, UV exposure, and microbial degradation accelerate decay. In soil or sediment, eDNA persists longer (months to years). Document environmental conditions and validate persistence times for your study system using degradation experiments.

Can I use eDNA to estimate population abundance?

Not directly. eDNA read abundance is biased by many factors (PCR efficiency, primer binding, copy number, degradation, contamination). Relative abundance (comparing read proportions) is possible with careful standardization. For absolute abundance, combine eDNA with capture-mark-recapture or other density estimation methods.

What is the difference between OTU and ASV?

OTUs (operational taxonomic units) cluster reads at fixed similarity threshold (97%), which obscures sequence differences. ASVs (amplicon sequence variants) are exact sequence variants, each differing by one nucleotide. ASVs provide better resolution but assume errors have been corrected. Modern practice favors ASVs, but both are used depending on question and data quality.

Sources

  1. Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Hajibabaei, M., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2012). Environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology, 21(8), 1789-1793. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05542.x ↗
  2. Deakin, G., Pettitt-Wade, H., & Waldick, R. C. (2016). Environmental DNA metabarcoding: A review of the application to fish biodiversity assessment in temperate freshwaters. Environmental DNA, 1(1), 4-14. link ↗
  3. Ficetola, G. F., Miaud, C., Pompanon, F., & Taberlet, P. (2008). Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biology Letters, 4(4), 423-425. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Environmental DNA Metabarcoding. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/ecology/edna-metabarcoding

Related methods

Bioaccumulation ModelDistance SamplingFunctional DiversitySpecies Accumulation

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Bioaccumulation ModelEcology↔ compare
  • Distance SamplingEcology↔ compare
  • Functional DiversityEcology↔ compare
  • Species AccumulationEcology↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

Species AccumulationBeta Diversity PartitioningRhizosphere Amplicon AnalysisMetagenomic BinningIndicator ValueElectrofishingEcotoxicological TestingSpecies Distribution Models (MaxEnt)

Related reference concepts

DNA BarcodingBiodiversity Inventory and the Taxonomic ImpedimentSpecies Richness and Diversity IndicesBiodiversity Monitoring and IndicatorsMolecular Species DelimitationBiodiversity Patterns and Measurement

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — eDNA Metabarcoding (Environmental DNA Metabarcoding). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/ecology/edna-metabarcoding · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Pierre Taberlet
Subfamily
Molecular ecology
Year
2012
Type
species detection and community assessment
Related methods
Bioaccumulation ModelDistance SamplingFunctional DiversitySpecies Accumulation
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account