Multi-Attribute Utility Theory
MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. in 1976. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
U(A_i) ∈ [0,1] with linear utility functions. Higher U means greater overall utility. MAUT requires that criteria satisfy preferential independence (stronger: additive independence) for the additive form to be valid. In practice, this is often assumed without formal verification. Non-linear utility functions (exponential, etc.) can be specified per criterion if the decision-maker's risk attitude warrants it.
Strengths & limitations
- Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
- Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
- Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.
Sources
- Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley ISBN: 978-0-521-43883-4
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Multi-Attribute Utility Theory. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/maut
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- AHPDecision-making↔ compare
- ANPDecision-making↔ compare
- BWMDecision-making↔ compare
- BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
- CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
- CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
- CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
- CRITICDecision-making↔ compare