Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Fuzzy Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (TFN)
MCDMWeight SubjectiveFuzzy TFN

Fuzzy Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (TFN)

F-LMAW (Fuzzy Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (TFN)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Božanić, D., Pamučar, D., Milić, A., Marinković, D., Komazec, N. in 2021 crisp; 2022 variant applicator. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

F-LMAW
COPRASEDASLMAWMABACMARCOSTOPSISVIKORWASPAS

When to use it

F-LMAW returns crisp criterion weights on the simplex (Σ w_j = 1, w_j ≥ 0) from linguistic expert assessments. Use it when (i) only verbal expert judgements are available, (ii) you want a logarithmic transform that compresses extreme priorities, and (iii) you have at least one expert and at least two criteria. With multiple experts, the Bonferroni mean (p=q=1 default) aggregates expert priorities before the logarithmic transform.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • Results depend on the chosen normalisation, weights, and parameter settings.

Sources

  1. Božanić, D., Pamučar, D., Milić, A., Marinković, D., Komazec, N. (2022). Modification of the Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) by a Triangular Fuzzy Number and Its Application in Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Axioms DOI: 10.3390/axioms11030089 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Fuzzy Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (TFN). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/f-lmaw

Related methods

COPRASEDASLMAWMABACMARCOSTOPSISVIKORWASPAS

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • COPRASDecision-making↔ compare
  • EDASDecision-making↔ compare
  • LMAWDecision-making↔ compare
  • MABACDecision-making↔ compare
  • MARCOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • TOPSISDecision-making↔ compare
  • VIKORDecision-making↔ compare
  • WASPASDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

ZF-LMAWLMAWFUZZY-SIWECFUCOM-FLOPCOWFUCOMLBWAFUZZY-AROMAN

Related reference concepts

Decision MakingDecision Support SystemsWeighted ScoresCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyApplied MathematicsParticipative Decision Making

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — F-LMAW (Fuzzy Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (TFN)). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/f-lmaw · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Božanić, D., Pamučar, D., Milić, A., Marinković, D., Komazec, N.
Subfamily
Weight Subjective
Year
2021 crisp; 2022 variant applicator
Type
Triangular-fuzzy linguistic expert weighting with Bonferroni aggregation; logarithmic transform around an absolute anti-ideal point
Value Space
Fuzzy TFN
Uncertainty
epistemic
Compensation
N/A
Rank Reversal
No
Related methods
COPRASEDASLMAWMABACMARCOSTOPSISVIKORWASPAS
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account