Delphi Method — iterative expert consensus for criterion importance elicitation
DELPHI (Delphi Method — iterative expert consensus for criterion importance elicitation) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. in 1963. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
Delphi iterates expert ratings until consensus is reached (CV < threshold, typically 0.20). The final weights are normalised means of expert ratings. Anonymity and controlled feedback prevent dominant-expert bias. Typically 2–4 rounds suffice.
Strengths & limitations
- Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
- Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
- Results depend on the chosen normalisation, weights, and parameter settings.
Sources
- Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Delphi Method — iterative expert consensus for criterion importance elicitation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/delphi
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- AHPSORTDecision-making↔ compare
- APLOCODecision-making↔ compare
- ARASDecision-making↔ compare
- AROMANDecision-making↔ compare
- ARTASIDecision-making↔ compare
- COBRADecision-making↔ compare
- COCOSODecision-making↔ compare
- CODASDecision-making↔ compare