Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Child Psychiatry›Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents
Process / pipelineemotion regulation and coping

Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents

Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQ-CA) · Also known as: ERQ-CA, ERQ-Child

The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQ-CA) is a 10-item self-report measure of emotion regulation strategies in children and adolescents ages 10–18 years. Based on Gross's process model of emotion regulation, the ERQ-CA assesses two key strategies: Cognitive Reappraisal (reinterpreting emotional situations to reduce emotional impact) and Expressive Suppression (inhibiting emotional responses). It is widely used in developmental psychology and clinical research to understand emotion management abilities and links to mental health outcomes.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children
Childhood Trauma Questio…Children's Depression In…Revised Children's Anxie…Autism Spectrum QuotientBarkley Adult ADHD Ratin…Children's Yale-Brown Ob…Parent-Child Relationshi…Pediatric Sleep Question…

When to use it

Primary uses: (1) Assessing emotion regulation strategies in children with anxiety or depression to identify cognitive reappraisal deficits; (2) baseline measurement in RCTs of emotion-regulation training or CBT to track strategy change; (3) research on longitudinal development of emotion regulation and links to mental health outcomes; (4) identifying children with emotion dysregulation who may benefit from targeted emotion-regulation skills training (DBT, STEPS-A); (5) understanding emotion regulation as mediator between childhood adversity (trauma, poverty) and mental health outcomes.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Brief, efficient (10 items, <10 minutes); suitable for high-volume clinical and research settings.
  • Theoretically-grounded: based on well-validated process model of emotion regulation (Gross & John, 1998).
  • Good reliability: internal consistency (Cronbach's α) 0.78–0.86 for reappraisal, 0.67–0.76 for suppression.
  • Extensively validated in diverse child populations: US, Europe, Asia; multiple languages available.
  • Clear dimensional approach: measures strategy use, not pathology; no cutoff scores or diagnoses.
  • Linked to important outcomes: reappraisal associated with better peer relationships, academic performance, lower anxiety/depression; suppression associated with opposite outcomes.
  • Developmentally-appropriate: language adapted from adult ERQ for child comprehension; validated ages 10–18.
Limitations
  • Only measures two strategies: reappraisal and suppression. Other emotion regulation strategies (acceptance, problem-solving, seeking support, mindfulness) not assessed.
  • Limited validity for children <10 years; abstract language difficult for younger children.
  • Suppression subscale modest internal consistency (α ~0.70) compared to reappraisal (α ~0.82).
  • Does not assess emotion regulation deficits in specific domains (anger, shame, fear); global assessment only.
  • Self-report bias: some children may report desired strategies rather than actual use. Discrepancy between self-report and behavioral observation can occur (e.g., child reports high reappraisal but low coping effectiveness).
  • Minimal information about behavioral implementation: child may endorse reappraisal items but implement strategy ineffectively. Requires behavioral assessment to confirm actual competence.

Frequently asked

I score high on Suppression. Does this mean I have anxiety or depression?

Not necessarily. High Suppression on ERQ-CA means you tend to inhibit emotional expression. Suppression is a risk factor for anxiety and depression (chronic suppression requires effort and can intensify underlying emotion), but it does not diagnose a disorder. Many people use suppression in some contexts without having clinical anxiety. To assess for anxiety/depression, answer questions about worry frequency, sad mood, and functional impairment on measures like RCADS or PHQ-9.

Is high Reappraisal always good?

Mostly yes—cognitive reappraisal is generally adaptive and associated with better mental health. However, excessive reappraisal without acknowledging genuine distress can become avoidant. For example, constantly reframing a genuinely difficult loss as 'a learning experience' without grieving can inhibit healthy emotional processing. Optimal emotion regulation is flexible: reappraise when helpful, accept and validate emotions when needed, and seek support when overwhelmed.

Can I change my Suppression score with practice?

Yes. Emotion regulation strategies are learnable skills. If you tend toward suppression, therapy (CBT, mindfulness, emotion-focused therapy) can help you develop and practice reappraisal and acceptance skills. With practice, reappraisal becomes more automatic and less cognitively effortful. Many teens who receive emotion regulation training show increased reappraisal and decreased suppression scores over weeks to months.

My child's ERQ-CA shows high suppression and high anxiety symptoms. What does this mean?

This pattern suggests your child is trying to inhibit emotional expression (suppression) while experiencing significant anxiety. The anxiety may be driving the suppression (trying to 'hold it together'), and the continuous suppression effort may intensify the underlying anxiety. Treatment should target both: therapy (CBT, acceptance-based) to reduce anxiety and teach reappraisal and acceptance instead of suppression.

Sources

  1. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (1998). Mapping the domain of expressivity: Multimethod evidence for a hierarchical model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 170–191. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.170 ↗
  2. Gee, D. G., Gabard-Durnam, L., Telzer, E. H., Humphreys, K. L., Goff, B., Shapiro, M., . . . Tottenham, N. (2014). Maternal buffering of human amygdala-prefrontal circuitry during childhood but not during adolescence. Psychological Science, 25(11), 2067–2078. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614550878 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQ-CA). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/child-psychiatry/emotion-regulation-questionnaire-child

Related methods

Childhood Trauma QuestionnaireChildren's Depression InventoryRevised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Childhood Trauma QuestionnaireChild Psychiatry↔ compare
  • Children's Depression InventoryChild Psychiatry↔ compare
  • Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression ScaleChild Psychiatry↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Autism Spectrum QuotientBarkley Adult ADHD Rating ScaleChildhood Trauma QuestionnaireChildren's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive ScaleParent-Child Relationship InventoryPediatric Sleep Questionnaire

Similar methods

Emotion Regulation QuestionnaireEmotion Dysregulation ScaleDifficulties in Emotion Regulation ScaleRevised Children's Anxiety and Depression ScaleAchenbach Youth Self-ReportStrengths and Difficulties QuestionnaireChildren's Depression InventoryMultidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children

Related reference concepts

Behavioral and Emotional Disorders in ChildrenAnxiety and Depression in Children and AdolescentsImpulse Control in YouthChild and Adolescent Clinical PsychologyDepressive Disorders and Mood DysregulationProtective and Resilience Factors

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQ-CA)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/child-psychiatry/emotion-regulation-questionnaire-child · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
James Gross (Emotion Regulation Theory)
Subfamily
emotion regulation and coping
Year
1998
Type
Self-report questionnaire
Related methods
Childhood Trauma QuestionnaireChildren's Depression InventoryRevised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account