Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Clinical Psychology›Corah Dental Anxiety Scale
Process / pipelinesituational/specific anxiety

Corah Dental Anxiety Scale

Also known as: DAS, CDAS

The Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS), also known as the Dental Anxiety Scale, is a brief 4-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure anxiety associated with dental treatment. Developed by Norman L. Corah in 1969, the DAS is the most widely used instrument for assessing dental anxiety in clinical practice and research, valued for its brevity, ease of administration, and strong psychometric properties.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Corah Dental Anxiety Scale
Beck Anxiety InventoryGeneralized Anxiety Diso…State-Trait Anxiety Inve…

When to use it

The DAS is recommended for routine screening of dental anxiety in dental practice settings, dental research, and clinical trials examining dental interventions or anxiety management strategies. It is suitable for adolescents (aged 12 and older) and adults. The DAS is particularly useful as a rapid screening tool before dental procedures to identify patients requiring anxiety management. It is less appropriate for comprehensive anxiety assessment across multiple domains.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Ultra-brief and practical — only 4 items taking less than 1 minute, maximizing feasibility in busy dental practices.
  • Excellent psychometric properties — internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.82), good test-retest reliability, and strong correlations with behavioral avoidance and dental treatment outcomes.
  • Practical cutoff values — well-established cutoff of 13+ identifies clinically significant dental anxiety requiring intervention.
  • Public domain and free — not copyrighted; freely available for clinical and research use.
Limitations
  • Ultra-brief scope — 4 items may not capture all dimensions of dental anxiety (e.g., specific procedural fears, pain expectations); longer scales may be necessary for comprehensive assessment.
  • Situational specificity — measures dental anxiety specifically; does not assess general anxiety levels or other anxiety disorders.
  • Limited detail — does not distinguish between anticipatory anxiety and anxiety during treatment, limiting clinical specificity.

Frequently asked

What DAS score indicates that a patient should receive anxiety management?

A score of 13 indicates moderate anxiety; 14 or higher indicates high anxiety. Many dentists offer anxiety management interventions (relaxation techniques, shorter appointments, sedation options) for patients with scores of 13 or higher. Individual patient preference also matters.

Is the DAS suitable for children?

The DAS is validated for ages 12 and older. For younger children, a separate measure (e.g., Frankl Scale for behavioral observation) is more appropriate.

Can the DAS be used repeatedly to track anxiety during dental treatment?

Yes. The DAS can be administered at each visit or at key points (baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment) to track changes in dental anxiety. This is useful for monitoring the effectiveness of anxiety management interventions.

How does the DAS differ from longer dental anxiety measures?

The DAS (4 items) is ultra-brief and practical for routine screening. Longer measures (e.g., Dental Fear Scale, 20 items) assess dental anxiety dimensions in greater detail. Use DAS for rapid screening; use longer measures when detailed assessment is needed.

Sources

  1. Corah, N. L. (1969). Development of a dental anxiety scale. Journal of Dental Research, 48(4), 596. DOI: 10.1177/00220345690480041801 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Corah Dental Anxiety Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/clinical-psychology/dental-anxiety-scale

Related methods

Beck Anxiety InventoryGeneralized Anxiety Disorder-7State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Beck Anxiety InventoryClinical Psychology↔ compare
  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7Clinical Psychology↔ compare
  • State-Trait Anxiety InventoryClinical Psychology↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

MDASCOVID-19 Anxiety ScaleCOHIPDepression Anxiety Stress ScalesSocial Interaction Anxiety ScaleGeneralized Anxiety Disorder ScaleHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleBrief Phobia Scales

Related reference concepts

Depression and Anxiety ScreeningDepression and Anxiety Disorder ScreeningCaries Classification SystemsOral Health Screening and Early DetectionDentistry and Oral HealthDMF and DMFT Index

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (Corah Dental Anxiety Scale). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/clinical-psychology/dental-anxiety-scale · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Norman L. Corah
Subfamily
situational/specific anxiety
Year
1969
Type
Self-report dental anxiety scale
Related methods
Beck Anxiety InventoryGeneralized Anxiety Disorder-7State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account