Methoden vergleichen

	Zeitreihen-Kreuzvalidierung (rollierendes/expandierendes Fenster)	Bootstrap-Inferenz	Diebold-Mariano-Test auf gleiche Prognosegenauigkeit
Fachgebiet	Ökonometrie	Statistik	Ökonometrie
Familie	Process / pipeline	Regression model	Hypothesis test
Entstehungsjahr	2012	1979	1995
Urheber	Christoph Bergmeir & José Benítez	Bradley Efron	Francis Diebold & Roberto Mariano
Typ	Forecast evaluation procedure	Resampling-based inference	Non-parametric forecast comparison test
Wegweisende Quelle	Bergmeir, C., & Benítez, J. M. (2012). On the use of cross-validation for time series predictor evaluation. Information Sciences, 191, 192–213.	Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1-26.	Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(3), 253–263.
Aliasnamen	Rolling-Origin Cross-Validation, Walk-Forward Validation, Expanding Window Evaluation, Zaman Serisi Çapraz Doğrulama	bootstrap, bootstrap resampling, nonparametric bootstrap, Bootstrap Çıkarımı	DM Test, Test of Equal Forecast Accuracy, Diebold-Mariano Forecast Comparison Test, Tahmin Doğruluğu Eşitliği Testi
Verwandt	3	5	3
Zusammenfassung	Time-series cross-validation is a resampling procedure designed for sequentially ordered data. Instead of randomly partitioning observations — which would destroy temporal structure and introduce data leakage — it advances a forecast origin one step at a time, fitting a model on all past data up to that origin and evaluating it on the immediately following out-of-sample period. Economists, financial analysts, and meteorologists use it whenever an honest, operationally realistic estimate of predictive accuracy is required for a time-ordered process.	Bootstrap inference, introduced by Bradley Efron in 1979, estimates the sampling distribution of a statistic by repeatedly resampling the observed data with replacement. It requires no distributional assumption and produces reliable confidence intervals even in small samples.	The Diebold-Mariano (DM) test, introduced by Diebold and Mariano in 1995, is a widely used non-parametric procedure for formally comparing the predictive accuracy of two competing forecasting models. It evaluates whether the difference in forecast errors between two models is statistically significant, without requiring nested models or specific distributional assumptions about the forecasts, making it broadly applicable across economics, finance, and time-series analysis.