Theory of Change Evaluation
Theory of change evaluation is a theory-based approach that evaluates a program against an explicit map of how and why it is expected to produce its intended outcomes. Rooted in Carol Weiss's work on theory-based evaluation and the Aspen Institute's community-initiatives projects of the 1990s, it requires evaluators to articulate the full causal pathway from activities through short- and intermediate-term outcomes to a long-term goal, make the underlying assumptions explicit, and then collect evidence to test whether each link in that chain holds in practice. The theory of change serves simultaneously as a planning tool and as the framework against which the program's progress and plausibility are judged.
Læs hele metoden
Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.
Metodekort
Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.
Kilder
- Weiss, C. H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts (pp. 65–92). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute. ISBN: 9780898431674
- Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 9780470478578
Sådan citerer du denne side
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Theory of Change Approach to Program and Policy Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/public-policy/theory-of-change-evaluation
Hvilken metode?
Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.
- Contribution AnalysisPublic Policy↔ sammenlign
- Process EvaluationPublic Policy↔ sammenlign
- Realist EvaluationPublic Policy↔ sammenlign
Refereret af
Lignende metoder
Har du fundet en fejl på denne side? Indberet den eller foreslå en rettelse →